17.12.2013 Views

FOI_2011-00646_Enclosure - Hanford Site

FOI_2011-00646_Enclosure - Hanford Site

FOI_2011-00646_Enclosure - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Progress Review Meeting<br />

Page 4<br />

* The Anomaly Work Package is being superseded by new technical procedures.<br />

IX.<br />

MATERIAL<br />

*DDI is planning to begin the process of ordering ecology blocks that will be used in the Trench I<br />

Silo remediation. (7/27) DDI is planning for approximately 150 ecology blocks. (8/3)<br />

0 WCH will be issuing an additional change notice for trench I that will require provision of<br />

means and methods as well as materials such as ecology blocks. (8/10) DDI should plan for<br />

draft specification from WCH by the end of the week. (8/3 1) WCH still waiting on<br />

specifications from Design Engineering group to finalize issuing change notice for remainder<br />

of Trench I changes.<br />

X. QUALITY<br />

*WCH QA will be conducting surveillance on contract flowdown and review of sub-tier QA<br />

programs. (5/25) This is ongoing. (6/1) There may be an issue with the flowdown of submittals<br />

between Watts and DDI. WCI- QA suggests that DDI review their contract to determine if there<br />

is a breakdown. Per the WCH QA this is becoming an item of increasing interest for DOE and<br />

WCH. (6/8) DDI should be prepared for an inspection of their QA plan and flow-downs by<br />

WCH QA in the near future. (6/29) DDI provided copy of surveillance by WCH QA. This<br />

surveillance will be ongoing this week and next. (7/14) The surveillance will be conducted on<br />

7/22 for this site. (7/20) This surveillance is ongoing to additional sub-tiers. Results are not<br />

anticipated to be positive. There appears to be serious issues with flowdown of DDI QA plan to<br />

sub tiers. WCH QA is concerned about how the QA plan is being implemented by sub-tiers.<br />

These issues are of considerable concern to WCH. (7/27) DDI and WCH QA to meet to discuss<br />

flow downs. (8/3) WCH QA will be issuing letter to DDI outlining the details of the<br />

surveillance results.<br />

o WCH QA still has concern about DDI flowdown to WCI. DDI indicated that WCI has<br />

provided letter indicating they intend to work to the DDI QA plan. DDI indicated they have<br />

not assessed WCI to determine that WCI is adhering to the QA plan. (8/10) DDI would like<br />

a response in writing outlining the concerns that WCH QA has that WCI is not working to the<br />

DDI QA program. (8/17) WCH will be issuing SDR this week to DDI for deficiencies. (FR-<br />

201 O-IF-0664-SDR-023) (8/24) DDI has received the SDR and indicated they will address<br />

issues. (8/3 1) DDI will be submitting QA Program rewrite this week. (9/7) This has been<br />

pushed out. (9/22) WCH QA and DDI PM to meet to discuss SDR and response. (9/28)<br />

o DDI developing NCR #2, CAP to be provided to WCH for acceptance prior to resumption of<br />

use of breathing air equipment. (9/22) WCR to provide SDR today to DDI. (9/28)<br />

XI.<br />

XII.<br />

REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION<br />

a None.<br />

TECHNICAL DATA SUBMITTALS/STATUS<br />

* See attached.<br />

" WCH requests as-built drawings of the energized water system. No update (5/4). No update.<br />

(5/11) SDR provided, no update. (5/18) No update. (5/25) No update. (6/8) Water line as-builts<br />

are being marked up for WCH review prior to being submitted. WCH stressed that the as-builts<br />

need to indicate the location of the water lines from hook up at the fence to the high tower. (6/8)<br />

No change. (6/15) No change. (6/22) WCH to provide new drawing number for the as-built<br />

drawing. (6/29) WCH will also provide a CADD base file to DDI for this drawing. (7/6) DDI<br />

has received base CADD file and is in process of updating drawing. They commit to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!