14.11.2013 Views

Bijzondere interventies aan het hart - Gezondheidsraad

Bijzondere interventies aan het hart - Gezondheidsraad

Bijzondere interventies aan het hart - Gezondheidsraad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

surgical backup. Another benefit of the regionalisation of cardiac care is that it<br />

enables chronic heart failure patients to be timely diagnosed and treated.<br />

5 Maintain central control via the permit policy<br />

Much of the care provided to patients with cardiovascular disease consists of<br />

interventions that are both acute and highly complex in nature. These often<br />

require extensive and costly human and material infrastructure. Such care must<br />

be provided efficiently, with a view to obtaining the best possible results, while<br />

preventing the associated costs from spiralling out of control. In the past, this<br />

requirement led to a situation in which centres for cardiac surgery and interventional<br />

cardiology were made subject to the provisions of the Special Medical<br />

Procedures Act (WBMV). Accordingly, the provision of this type of care<br />

requires a permit, which is granted by the government.<br />

This instrument (the Planning Decree for special cardiac interventions)<br />

allows central government, in the person of the Minister of Health, Welfare and<br />

Sport, to exercise control over the quality and accessibility of such care<br />

(VWS02). This approach was a major factor in optimising the actual care provided<br />

to heart patients, both in terms of quality and geographical distribution.<br />

The Minister has now asked w<strong>het</strong>her it is possible, and indeed desirable, for<br />

direct government involvement in this matter to be either restricted or terminated<br />

completely. For each type of cardiac treatment, recommendations have been<br />

made concerning the desirability of maintaining this type of government control,<br />

or of dispensing with it completely. In general terms also, this question deserves<br />

careful consideration. The conclusion is that there are strong arguments against<br />

deregulation and in favour of maintaining the permit requirement for cardiac<br />

centres.<br />

In the first place, the indications for treatment are still in a phase of rapid<br />

change, as a result of major developments in interventional cardiology, the treatment<br />

of cardiac arrhythmias, heart valve surgery, the treatment of heart failure,<br />

aortic surgery, and the care for adults with congenital cardiac defects.<br />

Secondly, it is essential that there be accessible care facilities capable of<br />

offering round-the-clock care, since patients with an acute disorder now make up<br />

an increasing percentage of the total (especially coronary disorders, aneurysms<br />

of the thoraco-abdominal aorta, cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure). If this is<br />

to be achieved, regulation is indispensable.<br />

Thirdly, there is an unequivocal and direct association between the number of<br />

procedures performed by an institution/therapist each year, and the results<br />

obtained. This necessitates the use of a quality policy in which a concentration of<br />

34 <strong>Bijzondere</strong> <strong>interventies</strong> <strong>aan</strong> <strong>het</strong> <strong>hart</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!