29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIR SUPERIORITY<br />

standards at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1943. Remarkably, this expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> force was<br />

paralleled by a steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> hours <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

given to each pilot. Between late 1942 and mid-1943, <strong>the</strong> average AAF<br />

pilot received somewhat less tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g than his ally <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> RAF and more<br />

than his enemy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Luftwaffe. After July 1943 <strong>the</strong> AAF average drew<br />

level with <strong>the</strong> RAF and <strong>the</strong>n pulled slightly ahead <strong>in</strong> 1944. By mid-1944<br />

future Allied pilots were receiv<strong>in</strong>g between 320 and 400 fly<strong>in</strong>g hours <strong>of</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, as compared with just over 100 for Luftwaffe cadets.18 The<br />

Luftwaffe was caught <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly vicious circle. As its less qualified<br />

pilots entered <strong>the</strong> force, <strong>the</strong>y were killed or <strong>in</strong>jured at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rates<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y had to fight fresh pilots who were better tra<strong>in</strong>ed as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

veterans whose experience made <strong>the</strong>m more lethal adversaries with each<br />

pass<strong>in</strong>g day.<br />

There were also major differences <strong>in</strong> force structure between <strong>the</strong> Luftwaffe<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Allied air forces. The Luftwaffe began <strong>the</strong> war with a balanced<br />

force conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fighters, dive bombers, medium bombers, and<br />

reconnaissance and transport aircraft. By mid- 1943 <strong>the</strong> medium bomber<br />

force had suffered a severe decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> numbers and adequately tra<strong>in</strong>ed aircrew,<br />

a fact that greatly reduced <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fensive weapons available to <strong>the</strong><br />

Luftwaffe <strong>in</strong> any struggle for air superiority. The Germans did not possess<br />

a long-range heavy bomber force at <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, nor did <strong>the</strong>y succeed<br />

<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a reliable mach<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>in</strong> any quantity dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> conflict. Many German airmen recognized <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fensive potential represented<br />

by <strong>the</strong> strategic bomber. Yet <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> raw material and<br />

petroleum constra<strong>in</strong>ts, design problems, and <strong>the</strong> clear need to develop first<br />

those forces capable <strong>of</strong> directly support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> large land operations that<br />

would beg<strong>in</strong> immediately <strong>in</strong> any war <strong>in</strong> which Germany became <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

prevented <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> such a force before <strong>the</strong> war.I9 Some effort<br />

was <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> a strategic bomber project dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war, but poor organization<br />

and leadership, <strong>the</strong> old resource problems, and a bad aircraft design<br />

produced only small numbers <strong>of</strong> a very unreliable mach<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>the</strong> He-177).20<br />

By mid-1943, <strong>the</strong> Luftwaffe was an air force suffer<strong>in</strong>g from a steady deterioration<br />

<strong>in</strong> its effective <strong>of</strong>fensive power. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> large and grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

force <strong>of</strong> American and British long-range bombers allowed <strong>the</strong> Allies to<br />

attempt to ga<strong>in</strong> a general air superiority by attack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> aircraft,<br />

key supplies like aviation gasol<strong>in</strong>e, and <strong>the</strong> operational <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reich. In addition, <strong>the</strong> very large Allied force <strong>of</strong> medium bombers<br />

and fighter-bombers also gave <strong>the</strong> Allies <strong>the</strong> clear <strong>of</strong>fensive edge <strong>in</strong> any<br />

contest for local air superiority.<br />

Both sides possessed modern high-performance fighter aircraft. The<br />

best evidence seems to <strong>in</strong>dicate that, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American<br />

long-range fighters, nei<strong>the</strong>r side enjoyed any major performance advantages<br />

<strong>in</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> aircraft. As <strong>the</strong> Military Analysis Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

United States Strategic Bomb<strong>in</strong>g Survey (USSBS) noted:<br />

276

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!