29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KOREA<br />

ber <strong>of</strong> MacArthur’s staff. Dur<strong>in</strong>g World War 11, Stratemeyer had commanded<br />

Army air forces <strong>in</strong> Asia, first <strong>in</strong> India and Burma, and <strong>the</strong>n, after<br />

<strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 1945, <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.‘O He drew on his wartime experience <strong>in</strong> recommend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to General MacArthur on July 8, 1950, that FEAF be given<br />

operational control over all <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and naval air units operat<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

Japan or over Korea.” The previous day, Stratemeyer had appo<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

FEAF’s Vice Commander, Maj. Gen. Earle E. Partridge, Commander <strong>of</strong><br />

Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and given Partridge <strong>the</strong> mission <strong>of</strong> ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and hold<strong>in</strong>g air<br />

superiority over Korea.’* On July 11, Stratemeyer met with his Navy counterpart,<br />

Vice Adm. C. Turner Joy, <strong>in</strong> an effort to form <strong>the</strong> unified command<br />

that he had recommended to MacArthur. The product <strong>of</strong> that meet<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

a directive which pledged <strong>the</strong> staffs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Navy and FEAF commanders to<br />

“coord<strong>in</strong>ation control,” a phrase which held different mean<strong>in</strong>g for FEAF<br />

and Navy commanders.13 Stratemeyer <strong>in</strong> fact did not ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ater-wide<br />

control <strong>of</strong> U.N. air assets which he had requested; <strong>in</strong>deed, such powers<br />

were never given FEAF dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war, and Stratemeyer and his successor,<br />

Lt. Gen. Otto I? Weyland, were compelled to rely primarily upon <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />

relationships with Navy Far East <strong>Force</strong> commanders to <strong>in</strong>sure <strong>in</strong>terservice<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> air efforts.14<br />

Stratemeyer also had problems with General MacArthur’s staff. On<br />

July 16, 1950, MacArthur’s headquarters formed a target committee to<br />

allocate air strikes aga<strong>in</strong>st North Korean military, <strong>in</strong>dustrial, and transportation<br />

target^.'^ General Weyland, who replaced General Partridge as<br />

FEAF’s Vice Commander, had commanded tactical air units <strong>in</strong> World War<br />

I1 and recognized immediately that MacArthur’s headquarters lacked adequate<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and Navy representation.I6 He and Stratemeyer were able<br />

to conv<strong>in</strong>ce MacArthur to expand <strong>the</strong> headquarters target committee to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude senior FEAF personnel. After six weeks, <strong>the</strong> headquarters committee<br />

was replaced by one staffed and organized by FEAEI’ Though <strong>in</strong>vited<br />

to participate, <strong>the</strong> Navy decl<strong>in</strong>ed. Even without Navy membership, however,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Formal Target Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Far East <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>s served as an<br />

effective means <strong>of</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> U.N. air effort aga<strong>in</strong>st North Korea and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n aga<strong>in</strong>st North Korean and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese air forces.18 In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

operations, such as <strong>the</strong> amphibious assault on Inchon <strong>in</strong> September 1950<br />

that led to <strong>the</strong> liberation <strong>of</strong> Seoul, jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>, Navy, and Mar<strong>in</strong>e committees<br />

met beforehand to divide combat air patrol, reconnaissance, and<br />

air <strong>in</strong>terdiction responsibilities. It was not <strong>the</strong> system that Generals Stratemeyer<br />

and Weyland had pressed for, but it was one which, with Navy cooperation,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y could-and did-learn to live with.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> immediate threat posed by North Korean air units suppressed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>, augmented by <strong>the</strong> newly formed FEAF<br />

Bomber Command (three bomb groups), turned to assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> U.S. and<br />

South Korean forces <strong>the</strong>n under heavy pressure from mechanized North<br />

Korean ground units. Seoul had fallen to North Korean troops on June 28;<br />

46 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!