29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIR SUPERIORITY<br />

More specifically, <strong>the</strong>y were to attack a group <strong>of</strong> key target systems, among<br />

which <strong>the</strong> German aircraft <strong>in</strong>dustry was ranked second. In June, <strong>the</strong> Allied<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Chiefs <strong>of</strong> Staff issued a new policy to govern <strong>the</strong> strategic<br />

bomber <strong>of</strong>fensive-<strong>the</strong> POINTBLANK Directive. In that document, <strong>the</strong><br />

German aircraft <strong>in</strong>dustry, particularly that part <strong>of</strong> it devoted to fighter<br />

production, was elevated to <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> an “<strong>in</strong>termediate” objective<br />

second to none. The idea beh<strong>in</strong>d this particular language was that air<br />

superiority was not an end <strong>in</strong> itself, but <strong>the</strong> means to strategic attack on<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r key target systems. The air superiority and <strong>the</strong> attack on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

systems were part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preparation for OVERLORD, but many American<br />

and British airmen privately believed that <strong>the</strong> strategic bomb<strong>in</strong>g<br />

campaign would be decisive, reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion to a mere exercise <strong>in</strong><br />

occupation.35<br />

Three commands made up <strong>the</strong> Allied long-range heavy bomber<br />

forces-RAF Bomber Command, and <strong>the</strong> American Eighth and Fifteenth<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>s. <strong>Air</strong> Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Harris, <strong>the</strong> Commander <strong>in</strong> Chief<br />

<strong>of</strong> RAF Bomber Command, was completely unconv<strong>in</strong>ced <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> merits <strong>of</strong><br />

any attempt to attack limited and specific target systems, an approach he<br />

derided as “panacea” bomb<strong>in</strong>g. He thought such an approach was tactically<br />

unfeasible and he believed fervently <strong>in</strong> Bomber Command’s powers<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g Germany to defeat by destroy<strong>in</strong>g her major cities.36 Sir Arthur<br />

Harris’s views ensured that <strong>the</strong> POINTBLANK Directive was written to permit<br />

him enough latitude to carry on with his campaign. Elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

RAF <strong>Air</strong> Staff, chiefly <strong>the</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> Bomber Operations (<strong>Air</strong> Commodore<br />

S. 0. Bufton) and <strong>the</strong> Deputy Chief <strong>of</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Staff (<strong>Air</strong> Marshal Sir Norman<br />

Bottomley), believed that <strong>the</strong> attack on <strong>the</strong> aircraft <strong>in</strong>dustry was so important<br />

that Bomber Command ought to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>, despite <strong>the</strong> obvious tactical<br />

difficulties. As 1943 wore on and <strong>the</strong> American Eighth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> ran <strong>in</strong>to<br />

grave difficulties <strong>in</strong> its attempts to carry out <strong>the</strong> POINTBLANK Directive,<br />

Bufton and Bottomley pressed Sir Arthur Harris to change his views3’ Not<br />

until February 1944, almost eight months after POINTBLANK had begun, did<br />

Bomber Command attack Schwe<strong>in</strong>furt, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important targets<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> POINTBLANK program. The British Official History regards this attack<br />

as <strong>the</strong> first blow <strong>of</strong> a genu<strong>in</strong>e “Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Bomber Offen~ive.”~~ As a<br />

result, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> campaign for a general air superiority, <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong> burden fell on <strong>the</strong> Eighth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and its commander, Maj. Gen.<br />

Ira C. Eaker. The Fifteenth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> was not formed until late 1943,<br />

and it made few significant attacks on <strong>the</strong> German aircraft <strong>in</strong>dustry until<br />

<strong>the</strong> next year.<br />

General Eaker’s efforts to implement <strong>the</strong> POINTBLANK Directive<br />

were frustrated by several key problems. The first was a considerable improvement<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> German flak and fighter defenses. The POINTBLANK<br />

plan, to which Eaker was a major contributor, had recognized that growth<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> enemy’s fighter force might imperil <strong>the</strong> attack on vital areas <strong>of</strong><br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!