29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIR SUPERIORITY<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued. U.S. aircraft devastated North Vietnam’s petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

and storage facilities <strong>in</strong> June and July; <strong>in</strong> September, ROLLING THUNDER<br />

air strikes were directed aga<strong>in</strong>st transportation routes. In Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, <strong>the</strong><br />

Central Intelligence Agency argued that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terdiction campaign was not<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g its objectives, <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t Chiefs pressed for a more <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

bomb<strong>in</strong>g effort, and <strong>the</strong> President tempori~ed.~~ In Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia, Seventh<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> F-105s began receiv<strong>in</strong>g externally carried jamm<strong>in</strong>g pods at <strong>the</strong><br />

end <strong>of</strong> October. The pods held barrage jammers. “If flight members ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

proper distances, <strong>the</strong> ECM pods denied <strong>the</strong> ground radars range,<br />

bear<strong>in</strong>g, and altitude <strong>in</strong>formati~n.”~~ The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pods, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />

<strong>the</strong> proper formation <strong>of</strong> F-1O5s, was cumulative; when coupled with <strong>the</strong><br />

spot jamm<strong>in</strong>g done by <strong>the</strong> EB-66s, <strong>the</strong> impact on North Vietnamese radars<br />

was dramatks7 The NVAF responded by aggressively attack<strong>in</strong>g F-105s,<br />

particularly with MiG-2ls, and that posed a problem for <strong>the</strong> F-4Cs<br />

escort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> F-105s. The MiG-21 had a higher service ceil<strong>in</strong>g than <strong>the</strong><br />

F4C (42,000 feet versus 36,000 feet). Directed by GCI radars, MiG-21s<br />

attacked U.S. strike formations from above, mak<strong>in</strong>g one div<strong>in</strong>g pass, sometimes<br />

fir<strong>in</strong>g a heat-seek<strong>in</strong>g missile, and <strong>the</strong>n zoom<strong>in</strong>g away. In <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

dives, <strong>the</strong> MiG-21s did not give escort<strong>in</strong>g F-4Cs time for a missile shot,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Phantoms, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> danger that MiG-17s might pounce on<br />

F-105s from below, dared not fly as a high-altitude screen between <strong>the</strong><br />

F-105s and <strong>the</strong> MiG-21s. Yet <strong>the</strong> F-4 was faster than <strong>the</strong> MiG-21 and<br />

possessed a higher rate <strong>of</strong> acceleration. The trick was to free <strong>the</strong> F-4 from<br />

its escort role.<br />

On January 2, 1967, 14 flights <strong>of</strong> FACs, 6 flights <strong>of</strong> F-105 Iron Hand<br />

SAM suppressors, and 4 flights <strong>of</strong> F-104 cover<strong>in</strong>g fighters departed from<br />

Ubon (8th Tactical Fighter W<strong>in</strong>g) and Da Nang (366th Tactical Fighter<br />

W<strong>in</strong>g) and converged on Hanoi as part <strong>of</strong> Operation BOLO, a scheme to lure<br />

MiG-21s out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sanctuaries and <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> clutches <strong>of</strong> Seventh <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong><br />

Phantoms. The F-4Cs (half from Ubon, half from Da Nang) mounted <strong>the</strong><br />

jamm<strong>in</strong>g pods, which had been carried previously only by <strong>the</strong> F-105s. The<br />

plan was to have <strong>the</strong>m imitate F-105s and so draw NVAF MiGs out for a<br />

dogfight. Though <strong>the</strong> force from Da Nang was forced to turn back because<br />

<strong>of</strong> poor wea<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> “bait” from Ubon was challenged by MiGs from Phuc<br />

Yen, fifteen miles northwest <strong>of</strong> Hanoi. Three flights from <strong>the</strong> 8th Tactical<br />

Fighter W<strong>in</strong>g downed seven MiG-21s “with<strong>in</strong> 12 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>of</strong> combat.’’58<br />

Four days later, a second, smaller group <strong>of</strong> F-~CS, disguised as a reconnaissance<br />

flight, attracted more MiG-21s and shot down two. Apparently react<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

to such one-sided encounters, <strong>the</strong> North Vietnamese <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> avoided<br />

USAF formations until February 1967.59 BOLO showed that MiG-21s could<br />

be defeated by F-4Cs; unfortunately, <strong>in</strong> February and March Seventh <strong>Air</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong> units were ordered to attack new ground targets (steel manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

facilities) and <strong>the</strong>re was no time to stage any repeats <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong><br />

January 2.<br />

536

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!