29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WAR AGAINST JAPAN<br />

opposition from <strong>the</strong> ground or air, for whatever reason, portended <strong>the</strong> last<br />

crisis for Japan. Indeed, a number <strong>of</strong> U.S. planners and commanders<br />

became conv<strong>in</strong>ced that <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed impact <strong>of</strong> direct air attack and blockade<br />

could compel <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al decision without an <strong>in</strong>vasion. Japan had<br />

been brought to such dire straits despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

American air <strong>of</strong>fensive <strong>in</strong> general “had as yet reached only a fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> its planned proportion,” as U.S. Strategic Bomb<strong>in</strong>g Survey analysts<br />

later observed. For example, air assaults aga<strong>in</strong>st Japan’s rail and<br />

transportation network were merely gett<strong>in</strong>g underway at <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>of</strong><br />

August<br />

Allied decisionmakers, however, were still uncerta<strong>in</strong> about <strong>the</strong> decisiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air and naval <strong>of</strong>fensive <strong>in</strong> conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Japanese government<br />

and high command to negotiate an early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> hostilities.<br />

Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>refore proceeded on <strong>the</strong> basic assumption conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> directives issued by <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t Chiefs <strong>of</strong> Staff on April 3, 1945, that ground<br />

armies would have to be used to <strong>in</strong>vade Kyushu and Honshu <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

compel Japan to capitulate unconditionally. On May 28, 1945, General<br />

MacArthur’s headquarters <strong>in</strong> Manila drafted <strong>the</strong> first edition <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive<br />

“strategic plan for operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese archipelago.” The<br />

Kyushu <strong>in</strong>vasion (Operation OLYMPIC, scheduled for November 1945) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Honshu <strong>in</strong>vasion (Operation CORONET, set for March 1946) were<br />

grouped under <strong>the</strong> collective code name <strong>of</strong> DOWNFALL.^^^<br />

The OLYMPIC operation was particularly designed to project U.S. landbased<br />

air forces <strong>in</strong>to sou<strong>the</strong>rn Kyushu, with a view to support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> second,<br />

“knock-out blow to <strong>the</strong> enemy’s heart” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tokyo-Yokohama<br />

region. American planners had no illusions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity or tenacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese response. The land<strong>in</strong>gs were expected to be opposed by<br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enemy’s available military forces us<strong>in</strong>g every means, and by a<br />

“fanatically hostile population” resist<strong>in</strong>g to “<strong>the</strong> utmost extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

capabilities.” Once <strong>the</strong> Allies had secured control <strong>of</strong> Kyushu, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

forces committed to Operation CORONET would be able to draw upon a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum equivalent <strong>of</strong> 40 land-based Army and USMC air groups and<br />

upon naval elements for direct support and blockade. The land-based “air<br />

garrison” <strong>of</strong> about 2,800 planes would specifically <strong>in</strong>clude 16 fighter and<br />

fighter-bomber groups and 4 night-fighter squadrons.122<br />

The OLYMPIC land<strong>in</strong>gs would require <strong>in</strong>tensive air preparation, <strong>the</strong><br />

heaviest practicable neutralization <strong>of</strong> enemy air, ground, and naval forces<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g with or limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion. Attacks<br />

by carrier task groups would be coord<strong>in</strong>ated with prolonged action by landbased<br />

units <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lbentieth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r air forces strik<strong>in</strong>g massively<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Marianas and <strong>the</strong> Ryukyus. All-out effort would peak dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> ten days preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>of</strong>fensive air<br />

superiority from <strong>the</strong> outset. It was <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>the</strong>refore to destroy hostile air<br />

power <strong>in</strong> Kyushu and nearby, to isolate <strong>the</strong> objective areas <strong>of</strong> Miyazaki,<br />

433

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!