29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KOREA<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> brief <strong>in</strong>terval that F-86 pilots usually had to make a In June <strong>of</strong><br />

that year, 4th Fighter-Interceptor Group renewed its request for a more<br />

powerful armament and also asked for a lighter aircraft.86 Lighten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

F-86 to make it more maneuverable was an option that had already been<br />

considered and rejected.87 Like all military aircraft designs, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

F-86 was a strict compromise. To <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> F-86’s rate <strong>of</strong> climb and<br />

maximum speed, eng<strong>in</strong>eers could give <strong>the</strong> plane a more powerful eng<strong>in</strong>e, or<br />

cut its weight, or both. But <strong>the</strong>y could not reduce <strong>the</strong> plane’s weight without<br />

also reduc<strong>in</strong>g some o<strong>the</strong>r important military characteristics, such as<br />

endurance or armament load. The F-86 was not designed to be a daylight<br />

air superiority fighter. It was developed as an all-purpose fighter-bomber.<br />

Any serious redesign would <strong>in</strong> fact become an entirely new aircraft.<br />

Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> had recovered parts <strong>of</strong> a MiG-15 as early as April<br />

1951.88 It was soon clear that <strong>the</strong> F-86 could not be modified to <strong>the</strong> same<br />

design standards. However, fighter pilots cont<strong>in</strong>ued to demand F-86 flight<br />

improvements and new guns and gunsights. General Partridge, who had left<br />

Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>in</strong> June 1951 to head <strong>the</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Research and Development<br />

Command (ARDC). was well aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilots’ concerns. He rout<strong>in</strong>ely<br />

read Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> operations reports and <strong>in</strong>telligence summaries, and he<br />

also reviewed reports filed by North American Aviation on F-86 improvement~.~~<br />

In January 1952, USAF Headquarters directed ARDC to beg<strong>in</strong> a<br />

comprehensive program to better <strong>the</strong> combat performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> F-86. Partridge<br />

assigned <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> task to <strong>the</strong> Wright <strong>Air</strong> Development<br />

Center, and <strong>in</strong>tensive work began on improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> F-86’s rate <strong>of</strong> climb at<br />

<strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> February. By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> May, some solutions were ready<br />

for trial.g0 The most significant was one suggested first by North American<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers: seal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g edge slats on <strong>the</strong> Sabre’s w<strong>in</strong>gs. Kits to convert<br />

<strong>the</strong> F-86’s w<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> new configuration were combat tested <strong>in</strong> Korea<br />

by <strong>the</strong> 4th Fighter-Interceptor W<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> July 1952 with impressive results,<br />

and gradually all <strong>the</strong> earlier Sabre models were converted to <strong>the</strong> new w<strong>in</strong>g<br />

configuration. At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> June 1952, 4th W<strong>in</strong>g squadrons received <strong>the</strong><br />

first production models <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new variant, <strong>the</strong> F-86F.<br />

That <strong>the</strong> solid lead<strong>in</strong>g-edge F-86F’s were <strong>in</strong> combat was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best-kept USAF<br />

secrets, and <strong>the</strong> modification was mysteriously mentioned <strong>in</strong> American newspapers<br />

as <strong>the</strong> “new secret device” and <strong>the</strong> “new combat device” which was giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased MiG kills.91<br />

What it also produced were higher land<strong>in</strong>g speeds. The orig<strong>in</strong>al F-86s were<br />

designed with slats at <strong>the</strong>ir w<strong>in</strong>gs’ lead<strong>in</strong>g edges that changed <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>gs’<br />

configuration with <strong>the</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airplane to give <strong>the</strong> swept-back fighter<br />

sufficient lift for lower speed land<strong>in</strong>gs. The swept-back w<strong>in</strong>gs reduced<br />

drag at high speeds but cost <strong>the</strong> aircraft lift at slower speeds, and <strong>the</strong><br />

variable lead<strong>in</strong>g edges had been developed by German designers at <strong>the</strong><br />

end <strong>of</strong> World War I1 to reduce <strong>the</strong> stall speeds <strong>of</strong> swept-back designs.<br />

It was a matter <strong>of</strong> compromise: to improve low-speed stall charac-<br />

489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!