29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIR SUPERIORITY<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time, it was difficult to know what to make <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>flated claims<br />

submitted by <strong>the</strong> Eighth's air gunners, except to admit that <strong>the</strong>y were too<br />

high. Inflated <strong>the</strong>y certa<strong>in</strong>ly were, but <strong>in</strong> October <strong>the</strong> Luftwaffe lost no<br />

less than 41.9 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fighter establishment with which it had entered<br />

<strong>the</strong> month.90<br />

In short, both <strong>the</strong> attackers and <strong>the</strong> defenders suffered casualties at a<br />

very high rate <strong>in</strong> 1943. The difference between <strong>the</strong> two was to be found <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> production and replacement pipel<strong>in</strong>e cont<strong>in</strong>ued to expand<br />

<strong>the</strong> Allied air forces and to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> aircrew quality, while <strong>the</strong><br />

Luftwaffe was barely able to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> its frontl<strong>in</strong>e strength with aircrew <strong>of</strong><br />

dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g quality.<br />

The first six months <strong>of</strong> 1944 cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>the</strong> basic pattern laid down <strong>in</strong><br />

1943. In January, <strong>the</strong> Eighth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> wrote <strong>of</strong>f 211 bombers. The figure<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued to rise to 409 <strong>in</strong> April, <strong>the</strong>n fell <strong>of</strong>f slightly to 366 <strong>in</strong> May and<br />

more significantly to 280 <strong>in</strong> June.91 The Eighth also lost <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> fighters over this period, <strong>the</strong> toll ris<strong>in</strong>g from a January low <strong>of</strong> 65 to a June<br />

high <strong>of</strong> 242. Expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> credited sorties, however, <strong>the</strong><br />

heavy bomber losses fell when compared to <strong>the</strong> horrors <strong>of</strong> August and<br />

October 1943. The highest percentage was 3.8 <strong>in</strong> January; by May it had<br />

fallen still fur<strong>the</strong>r to 1.1. (See Figure 6-6) These changes were <strong>the</strong> consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a greatly expanded force and <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> deep fighter<br />

escort. In July <strong>of</strong> 1943, <strong>the</strong> average number <strong>of</strong> heavy bomber aircraft<br />

available for operations was 378. By January 1944, <strong>the</strong> figure had climbed<br />

FIGURE 6-6<br />

Eighth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Heavy Bomber Losses<br />

Expressed as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> Sorties<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun<br />

1943 1943 1943 1943 1943 1943 1944 1944 1944 1944 1944 1944<br />

298

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!