29.12.2013 Views

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

Case Studies in the Achievement of Air Superiority - Air Force ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KOREA<br />

target<strong>in</strong>g impossible. The ground radar operators responded to this tactic<br />

by switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir radar frequencies.<br />

The duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> B-29 electronic countermeasures (ECM) operators<br />

was to switch <strong>the</strong>ir jammer frequencies as quickly as possible after any<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> ground-based radar frequencies were detected. Deceiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

enemy radars was <strong>the</strong> second basic tactic; this was accomplished with<br />

chaff-th<strong>in</strong> foil strips cut at lengths that would reflect ground radar pulses.<br />

By dispens<strong>in</strong>g chaff, bombers could create false targets-so many, <strong>in</strong> fact,<br />

that ground antiaircraft controllers could not tell <strong>the</strong> real bombers from <strong>the</strong><br />

fake until <strong>the</strong> raid was over.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> ECM greatly reduced bomber losses, but night bombardment<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed hazardous duty. The reduced accuracy <strong>of</strong> night<br />

bomb<strong>in</strong>g strikes forced bombers to return periodically to North Korean<br />

airfields to keep <strong>the</strong>m closed. In November 1951, Weyland def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />

primary mission <strong>of</strong> FEAF’s Bomber Command as <strong>the</strong> systematic<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> North Korean airfields; <strong>in</strong> December, Weyland ordered<br />

<strong>the</strong> B-29s to strike at least one important airfield every night.’” So <strong>the</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and North Koreans knew <strong>the</strong> B-29s would be com<strong>in</strong>g regularly.<br />

Their tactic was to pick up <strong>the</strong> approach<strong>in</strong>g bombers on early warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

radars, <strong>the</strong>n use GCI radars to vector MiGs <strong>in</strong> toward <strong>the</strong> bomber stream.<br />

Searchlight radars would target <strong>the</strong> bombers, and a cone <strong>of</strong> lights would<br />

illum<strong>in</strong>ate one B-29. MiGs would only attack when <strong>the</strong>y saw a bomber<br />

illum<strong>in</strong>ated by searchlight or by <strong>the</strong> moon. Directly over <strong>the</strong> target, <strong>the</strong><br />

B-29s ran a gauntlet <strong>of</strong> flak. This was, <strong>in</strong> most respects, a replay <strong>of</strong> World<br />

War 11; bcth sides used established tactics and proven (nearly obsolescent)<br />

equipment.<br />

The B-29s responded to <strong>the</strong> enemy tactics with countermeasures <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own: fly<strong>in</strong>g at altitudes which would not produce centrails, fe<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

toward one target and <strong>the</strong>n strik<strong>in</strong>g at some o<strong>the</strong>r field, tighten<strong>in</strong>g formations<br />

to place <strong>the</strong> greatest number <strong>of</strong> bombers over <strong>the</strong> target <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortest<br />

possible time, and pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g bombers nonreflective black underneath to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong>ir visibility. B-29s were not allowed to drop chaff until 1951, nor<br />

were <strong>the</strong>ir ECM operators permitted to jam enemy GCI ground-to-plane<br />

VHF communications. The latter were listened to by <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> and Navy<br />

radio <strong>in</strong>tercept units for <strong>in</strong>telligence purposes. However, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence<br />

material so ga<strong>the</strong>red was classified Top Secret, and Bomber Command<br />

and Fifth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> were not conv<strong>in</strong>ced that <strong>the</strong> benefits ga<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

such <strong>in</strong>telligence were worth <strong>the</strong> added risk to B-29 groups.” B-29 ECM<br />

operators were also not permitted to jam enemy early warn<strong>in</strong>g radars. This<br />

prohibition was <strong>in</strong>tended to conceal overall U.S. ECM capability so that no<br />

tactics <strong>the</strong>n practiced by <strong>the</strong> Strategic <strong>Air</strong> Command would be compromised.<br />

The enemy also developed electronic counter countermeasures<br />

(ECCM). When B-29s jammed enemy fire control radars, <strong>the</strong> operators on<br />

<strong>the</strong> ground would DF (use direction-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g gear) <strong>the</strong> B-29 broadcasts to<br />

48 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!