УНИВЕРЗИТЕТ „СВ. КИРИЛ И МЕТОДИЈ“ – СКОПЈЕ

132
Literatura:
1. Chafe, W. L.: Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and
point of view. Subject and Topic, red. Charles N. Li 25-55. Academic Press,
New York, 1976.
2. Čašule, I.: The functional load of the short pronominal forms and the doubling
of the object in Macedonian, Journal of Slavic Linguistics 5, 3-19,
1997.
3. Friedman, V.: Variation and Grammaticalization in the Development of
Balkanisms“. CLS 30 Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago
Linguistic Society, Volume 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic
Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, 1994, 101-115.
4. Jaeger, T. F.; Gerassimova, V. A.: . Bulgarian word order and the role of
the direct object clitic in LFG. In Butt, M. & T. H. King (eds.): Proceedings
of the LFG02 Conference, CSLI Publications, Stanford: 2002.
5. Jaeger, T. F.: Topicality and superiority in Bulgarian wh-questions.
Proceedings of FASL 12, 2004, 207-228.
6. Kallulli, D.: Clitics in Albanian. Working Papers in Linguistic, University
of Trondheim, 1995.
7. Leafgren, J.: Degrees of Explicitness: Information Structure and the
Packaging of Bulgarian Subjects and Objects. J. Benjamins, 2002.
8. Mišeska-Tomić, O.: The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics, Natural Language
and Linguistic Theory 14, 1996, 811-872.
9. Prince, E. F.: On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions.
Vo A. Farley, P. Farley, i K.-E. McCullough, red., Papers from the
Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 22nd Meeting of the
Chicago Linguistic Society, 1986, 208-22.
10. Vallduví, E.: The Informational component. Garland, New York, 1992.