28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1408 Kaye H. Kilburn<br />

Sensitivity’s main dimensions are time and mapping. For example, balance is measured<br />

using the classic Romberg stance (1850) standing feet together with eyes ahead open<br />

and then closed and using a force (displacement) platform or even simpler the position <strong>of</strong><br />

the head from a sound emitter secured to a headband and recorded by two microphones to<br />

inscribe the distance swayed and the speed, in centimeters per second. 19 From three performances<br />

for 20 seconds with the eyes closed alternating with the eyes open the minimal<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> sway is selected. The inscribed path, the map, may provide more information but<br />

how to interpret this is unclear.<br />

Eye-hand choice reaction time is tested as the speed to cancel by tapping a keypad, a 4<br />

inch letter that appears on the screen <strong>of</strong> a laptop computer. 20 Twenty trials repeated twice<br />

and the median time <strong>of</strong> last 7 trials in each run is recorded. Simple, same letter, reaction time<br />

takes 1/4 <strong>of</strong> a second, 250 ms while choice between 2 letters takes twice as long, 500 ms.<br />

Many tests are faster in women, most deteriorate with aging after 25 years and for people<br />

with more years <strong>of</strong> educational attainment scores are higher. 21<br />

Vision is measured by mapping for color perception which is a central retinal cone<br />

function. This consists <strong>of</strong> placing 15 pale colors in a spectral array, the Lanthony<br />

desaturated hue test. Retinal rod function which is light perception was mapped for the central<br />

30 o <strong>of</strong> each visual field at 80 points using an automated perimeter recording to a laptop<br />

computer. 22 This standardized and speeded up the fields that had been done by the tangent<br />

screen and a skilled operator for 100 years.<br />

It was logical to consider the 12 nerves <strong>of</strong> the head, cranial nerves as the scaffold for<br />

organizing tests and for reviewing brain functions that are adversely affected by chemicals.<br />

Smell (Nerve I, olfactory), is tested by recognition <strong>of</strong> familiar odors and <strong>of</strong> threshold concentration<br />

for detecting them. Smell disorders include loss and disturbed perception. Nerve<br />

II, the optic was described above. Nerves III, IV and VI move the eyes and rarely show effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemicals. An exception is the optokinetic effects <strong>of</strong> styrene. In contrast the faces<br />

sensory nerve, the trigeminal, number V and motor nerve, the facial, number VII are<br />

needed to blink and are tested by blink reflex latency which is measured<br />

electromyographically in milliseconds (10 to 15 ms) after stimulation by a tap, that is mechanical<br />

or an electrical impulse. Blink is slowed by exposures to chlorinated solvents like<br />

trichloroethylene (TCE), by chlorine and by arsenic. Nerve VIII has hearing and vestibular<br />

(balance) divisions which are tested by audiometry and by sway speed for balance. Nerve<br />

IX, the glossopharyngeal innervates the throat and is needed for the gag reflex and<br />

baroreceptor. Nerve X, the vagus X is evaluated by recording variations <strong>of</strong> heart rate with<br />

breathing. Nerves XI, spinal accessory is tested as strength <strong>of</strong> neck muscles and XII<br />

tongue’s hypoglossal nerve by speech.<br />

Using these tests implies comparing scores observed to a standard, an expected value.<br />

Ideally that would be to the same subject which is rarely possible, although it works for before<br />

and after exposures <strong>of</strong> workers. The next best comparisons are to suitable unexposed<br />

normal subjects who can be called controls. 21 We developed over several years a national<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> unexposed people, tested their performance and calculated expected values using<br />

prediction equations with coefficients for age, sex, education and other factors such as<br />

height and weight that affected some tests. Thus individual observed values for each subject<br />

are compared to predicted values (observed/predicted x100) equal percent predicted. Frequently,<br />

we needed to be sure that comparison groups <strong>of</strong> apparently unexposed control people<br />

were normal because adverse effects are widespread. Next from the standard deviations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!