28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

300 Kenneth A. Connors<br />

that the composition dependence <strong>of</strong> the product �Âγ is being accounted for without claiming<br />

that we can independently assign composition dependencies to the separate factors in<br />

the product.<br />

5.5.4.3 Interpretation <strong>of</strong> parameter estimates<br />

Eq. [5.5.54] constitutes the basis for the resolution <strong>of</strong> the logical problem, described earlier,<br />

in which different cosolvents, with a given solute, yield different gA values, although gA<br />

had been assumed to be independent <strong>of</strong> composition. As eq. [5.5.54] shows, gA is determined<br />

by a difference <strong>of</strong> two fixed quantities, thus guaranteeing its composition independence,<br />

and at the same time permitting gA to vary with cosolvent identity.<br />

Eq. [5.5.53] is therefore conceptually sounder and physically more detailed than is eq.<br />

[5.5.23]. Eq. [5.5.53] shows, however, that in the absence <strong>of</strong> independent additional information<br />

(that is, information beyond that available from the solubility study alone) it is not<br />

possible to dissect the quantity (g2γ2A2 -g1γ1A1) into its separate terms. In some cases such<br />

additional information may be available, and here we discuss the example <strong>of</strong> naphthalene<br />

solubility in mixed aqueous-organic binary mixtures. Table 5.5.8 lists the values <strong>of</strong><br />

gA(γ2-γ1) obtained by applying eq. [5.5.23] to solubility data in numerous mixed solvent<br />

systems. 8 In an independent calculation, the solubility <strong>of</strong> naphthalene in water was written<br />

as eq. [5.5.55],<br />

( 0)<br />

*<br />

ΔG x = = ΔG<br />

+ g A γ [5.5.55]<br />

soln<br />

2 cryst 1 1 1<br />

which is equivalent to eq. [5.5.4]. ΔG cryst was estimated by conventional thermodynamic arguments<br />

and ΔG solv was omitted as negligible, 24 yielding the estimate g 1A 1γ 1 =4.64x10 -20 J<br />

molecule -1 . With eq. [5.5.54] estimates <strong>of</strong> g 2A 2γ 2 could then be calculated, and these are<br />

listed in Table 5.5.8.<br />

Table 5.5.8. Parameter estimates and derived quantities for naphthalene solubility in<br />

water-cosolvent mixtures at 25 o C a<br />

Cosolvent γ2, erg cm -2<br />

10 20 gA(γ2-γ1), J molecule -1<br />

10 20 g2A2γ2, J molecule -1<br />

Methanol 22.4 -3.11 +1.53<br />

Ethanol 21.8 -2.70 1.94<br />

Isopropanol 20.8 -2.19 2.45<br />

Propylene glycol 37.1 -2.46 2.18<br />

Ethylene glycol 48.1 -2.24 2.22<br />

Acetone 22.9 -3.37 1.27<br />

Dimethylsulfoxide 42.9 -3.67 0.97<br />

a Data from ref. (8); γ1 = 71.8 erg cm -2 ,g 1A 1γ 1=4.64x10 -20 J molecule -1 .<br />

Observe that g 1A 1γ 1 and g 2A 2γ 2 are positive quantities, as expected; gA(γ 2-γ 1) is negative<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the surface tension difference. It is tempting to divide each <strong>of</strong> these quantities<br />

by its surface tension factor in order to obtain estimates <strong>of</strong> gA, g 1A 1, and g 2A 2, but this<br />

procedure may be unsound, as proposed subsequently.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!