28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13.2 Solvent effects on free radical polymerization 781<br />

homopropagation reactions, especially in copolymerization <strong>of</strong> highly electrophilic and<br />

nucleophilic monomer pairs. Hence, when it is significant, charge transfer stabilization <strong>of</strong><br />

the transition state occurs to different extent in the cross- and homopropagation reactions,<br />

and thus exerts some net effect on the monomer reactivity ratios. Now, it is known that polar<br />

solvents can stabilize charged species, as seen in the favorable effect <strong>of</strong> polar solvents on<br />

both the thermodynamics and kinetics <strong>of</strong> reactions in which charge is generated. 34 Therefore,<br />

when charge transfer in the transition state is significant, the stability <strong>of</strong> the charge<br />

transfer species and thus the transition state would be affected by the polarity <strong>of</strong> the solvent,<br />

and thus a solvent effect on reactivity ratios would result.<br />

13.2.3.1.2 Copolymerization model<br />

There are two cases to consider when predicting the effect <strong>of</strong> solvent polarity on<br />

copolymerization propagation kinetics: (1) the solvent polarity is dominated by an added<br />

solvent and polarity is thus independent <strong>of</strong> the comonomer feed ratio, or (2) the solvent polarity<br />

does depend on the comonomer feed ratio, as it would in a bulk copolymerization. In<br />

the first case, the effect on copolymerization kinetics is simple. The monomer reactivity ratios<br />

(and additional reactivity ratios, depending on which copolymerization model is appropriate<br />

for that system) would vary from solvent to solvent, but, for a given copolymerization<br />

system they would be constant as a function <strong>of</strong> the monomer feed ratios. Assuming <strong>of</strong><br />

course that there were no additional types <strong>of</strong> solvent effect present, these copolymerization<br />

systems could be described by their appropriate base model (such as the terminal model or<br />

the explicit or implicit penultimate models), depending on the chemical structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

monomers.<br />

In the second case, the effect <strong>of</strong> the solvent on copolymerization kinetics is much more<br />

complicated. Since the polarity <strong>of</strong> the reacting medium would vary as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

comonomer feed ratios, the monomer reactivity ratios would no longer be constant for a<br />

given copolymerization system. To model such behavior, it would be first necessary to select<br />

an appropriate base model for the copolymerization, depending on the chemical structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the monomers. It would then be necessary to replace the constant reactivity ratios in<br />

this model by functions <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the comonomer mixture. These functions<br />

would need to relate the reactivity ratios to the solvent polarity, and then the solvent polarity<br />

to the comonomer feed composition. The overall copolymerization kinetics would therefore<br />

be very complicated, and it is difficult to suggest a general kinetic model to describe these<br />

systems. However, it is obvious that such solvent effects would cause deviations from the<br />

behavior predicted by their appropriate base model and might therefore account for the deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> some copolymerization systems from the terminal model composition equation.<br />

13.2.3.1.3 Evidence for polarity effects in propagation reactions<br />

The idea <strong>of</strong> charge separation in the transition state <strong>of</strong> the propagation step <strong>of</strong> free radical<br />

polymerization reactions, as suggested by Price, 35 was discounted by Mayo and Walling 36<br />

and many subsequent workers. 37 Their rejection <strong>of</strong> this idea was based upon the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

any unambiguous correlation between the reactivity ratios <strong>of</strong> a system and the dielectric<br />

constant <strong>of</strong> the solvent. For instance, in the copolymerization <strong>of</strong> STY with MMA, it was reported<br />

that the reactivity ratios were independent <strong>of</strong> small quantities <strong>of</strong> water, ethyl benzene,<br />

dodecylmercaptans or hydroquinone, or the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> air 30,38,39 and were<br />

thus unaffected by the dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> the system. In contrast, other studies have found<br />

a relationship between dielectric constant and the reactivity ratios in specific systems. 40,41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!