28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> organic solvents on phase-transfer catalysis 833<br />

13.3.2.2 Effect <strong>of</strong> solvents on the reaction in triphase catalysis<br />

The disadvantage <strong>of</strong> using liquid-liquid phase-transfer catalysis (ll-PTC) is in the separation<br />

<strong>of</strong> catalyst from product after reaction. This problem can be overcome using the immobilized<br />

catalyst on a solid support (e.g., porous polymer pellet). Simple mechanical separation<br />

processes, such as filtration or centrifugation, can be employed to separate the solid catalyst<br />

from the product in liquid form. A detailed investigation <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> polymer particle on<br />

the reaction rate was conducted by Wang and coworkers. 131,133-137 Wang and Wu 136 studied<br />

the reaction <strong>of</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong> hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol in<br />

an organic solvent/alkaline solution by triphase catalysis. The polymer, which was prepared<br />

from the polymerization <strong>of</strong> styrene monomer and chloromethylstyrene monomer, served as<br />

the support for the immobilization <strong>of</strong> the catalyst.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> the polymer support, which can be related to the factors<br />

<strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking, ring substitution (RS), lipophilicity <strong>of</strong> the polymer, the chloride<br />

density and solvents on the imbibed compositions 84,118 on the reaction rate or conversion<br />

were investigated. This imbibed composition, influenced by the internal structures <strong>of</strong><br />

the triphase catalyst particles, affected the reactivities. The interaction <strong>of</strong> the polymer support<br />

pellet and the organic solvents play an important role in determining the reaction rate<br />

and the conversion <strong>of</strong> the reactant. The reaction could be improved to obtain a high reaction<br />

rate by using a polar solvent.<br />

For investigating the degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking <strong>of</strong> the polymer, the resistance <strong>of</strong> mass<br />

transfer within the catalyst pellet is small. When a smaller degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking <strong>of</strong> the<br />

polymer support is used. This is due to the fact that a larger value <strong>of</strong> the swell <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

was obtained when a small degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking <strong>of</strong> the polymer was used. Wang and Yu 131<br />

have similar observations for the reaction <strong>of</strong> allyl bromide and 2,4-dibromophenol under<br />

triphase catalysis. A maximum value exists for the degree <strong>of</strong> swell and the imbibed composition,<br />

as shown in Table 13.3.28 for the degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking. 136<br />

In Table 13.3.27, 136 the degree <strong>of</strong> swell for the polymer support with a 6% crosslinking<br />

is larger than that for the two other degrees <strong>of</strong> crosslinking. This implies that greater<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> NaOCH2CF3 were imbibed into the catalyst pellet with a 6% crosslinking. The<br />

reaction rate is directly related to the amount <strong>of</strong> the imbibed composition. Also, in Table<br />

13.3.27, the imbibed compositions are affected by the structure <strong>of</strong> the polymer support. The<br />

reactivity <strong>of</strong> the triphase catalysis can also be determined from the composition imbibed by<br />

the particles. It can be observed that the reactivities were highly affected by the lipophilicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the catalyst pellet for the substitution reaction in the organic phase and the hydrophilicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the catalyst pellet <strong>of</strong> the ion exchange in the aqueous phase. For example, the reaction<br />

rate in the organic phase was promoted by using a lipophilic polymer support catalyst when<br />

the substitution reaction rate was slow. In Table 13.3.27, the amount <strong>of</strong> chlorobenzene and<br />

water imbibed in the macroporous pellet was greater than that in the microporous pellets for<br />

most cases. 136 However, the macroporous pellet with 10% degree <strong>of</strong> crosslinking had the<br />

least lipophilicity and degree <strong>of</strong> swelling; therefore, the reactivity was the lowest for the<br />

macroporous pellet with a 10% crosslinking among the polymer-support catalysts. The reactivity<br />

environments which were created by the lipophilicity and the hydrophilicity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

polymer support plays an important role in determining the reactivity.<br />

It is known that the distribution <strong>of</strong> organic phase and aqueous phase existing in the porous<br />

pellet is affected by a change <strong>of</strong> the ring substitution (RS) <strong>of</strong> the polymer support. 84<br />

Wang and Wu 136 prepared three kinds <strong>of</strong> polymer supports with different numbers <strong>of</strong> ring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!