28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4 Measurement <strong>of</strong> solvent activity 187<br />

tation and diffusion coefficient yields virial coefficients <strong>of</strong> a polymer solution. The<br />

so-called Svedberg equation reads:<br />

⎛ D⎞<br />

⎡ 1<br />

2 ⎤<br />

⎜ ⎟( 1−<br />

ν2, spezρ1)<br />

= RT ⎢ + 2Ac 2 2 + 3Ac<br />

3 2 + � ⎥<br />

[4.4.52]<br />

⎝ s ⎠<br />

⎣M2<br />

⎦<br />

where:<br />

D diffusion coefficient<br />

ν2,spez partial specific volume <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

ρ1 density <strong>of</strong> the solvent<br />

c2 mass by volume concentration c2 =m2/ν A2,A3, ... second, third, ... osmotic virial coefficients<br />

M2 molar mass <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

Equation [4.4.52] is strictly valid for monodisperse polymers, i.e., one single component<br />

2. For polydisperse polymers, different averages were obtained for the sedimentation<br />

and the diffusion coefficient, which depends on the applied measuring mode and the subsequent<br />

calculations. The averages <strong>of</strong> M2 correspond with averages <strong>of</strong> D and s and are mixed<br />

ones that have to be transformed into the desired common averages - for details please see<br />

Refs. 35-37<br />

Sedimentation-diffusion equilibrium in an ultracentrifuge gives also a virial series: 35<br />

( 1−2,<br />

spez 1)<br />

2<br />

ω h ν ρ<br />

⎛ ∂lnc<br />

⎜<br />

⎝ ∂h<br />

2<br />

⎞ ⎡ 1<br />

2 ⎤<br />

⎟ = RT ⎢ + 2Ac 2 2 + 3Ac<br />

3 2 + �⎥<br />

⎠ ⎣M2<br />

⎦<br />

[4.4.53]<br />

where:<br />

h distance from the center <strong>of</strong> rotation<br />

ω angular velocity<br />

Equation [4.4.53] is again valid for monodisperse polymers only. Polydisperse polymers<br />

lead to apparent molar mass averages and to averages <strong>of</strong> the virial coefficients which<br />

have to be transformed into the desired common averages by appropriate calculation methods.<br />

35-37<br />

A somewhat different way <strong>of</strong> avoiding the virial expansion in Equation [4.4.53] was<br />

developed by Scholte. 176,177 Without going into details, his final relation was:<br />

where:<br />

( 1−<br />

2, spez 1)<br />

2<br />

ω h ν ρ<br />

Mw 1 2 ∂ μ1<br />

RT<br />

w2 1 ∂w2<br />

M<br />

⎛ ⎞ ⎡ Δ ⎛ M<br />

⎜<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ − ⎟<br />

= ⎢ + ⎜<br />

−<br />

⎠ ⎣ ⎝MM<br />

w2 mass fraction <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

M1 molar mass <strong>of</strong> the solvent<br />

Mn number average molar mass <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

Mw mass average molar mass <strong>of</strong> the polymer<br />

n refractive index <strong>of</strong> the solution<br />

1 1<br />

n w<br />

⎞⎤<br />

⎟<br />

⎟⎥<br />

⎠⎦<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

⎜ ⎟<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

⎛ dn dn ⎞<br />

/ ⎜<br />

⎟<br />

dh ⎟<br />

[4.4.54]<br />

⎝dw2<br />

⎠<br />

Some assumptions were made for the derivation <strong>of</strong> Equation [4.4.54], especially the<br />

partial specific volume, the refractive index, and the derivative dn/dw 2 must not depend on<br />

the molar mass distribution <strong>of</strong> the polymer. If one further assumes that the Flory-Huggins

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!