28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.4 Two-body interaction energy 425<br />

Figure 8.1. Interaction energy for a dimer with respect to<br />

the mutual approach distance at a fixed orientation.<br />

where necessary, with r ab and Ω ab. ΔE AB(R)<br />

has the status <strong>of</strong> a PES, with a shift in the<br />

reference energy, given here by the sum <strong>of</strong><br />

the energies <strong>of</strong> the two monomers.<br />

A function defined in a 6-dimensional<br />

space is hard to visualize. Many devices<br />

have been introduced to render in graphic<br />

form selected aspects <strong>of</strong> this function.<br />

Some will be used in the following: here we<br />

shall use the simplest graphical rendering,<br />

consisting in fixing an orientation (Ω ab) and<br />

two coordinates in the r ab set in such a way<br />

that the remaining coordinate corresponds<br />

to the mutual approach between molecule<br />

A and B, along a given straight trajectory<br />

and a fixed mutual orientation. A typical example is reported in Figure 8.1.<br />

The energy curve may be roughly divided into three regions. Region I corresponds to<br />

large separation between interaction partners; the interaction is feeble and the curve is relatively<br />

flat. Region II corresponds to intermediate distances; the interactions are stronger<br />

compared to region I, and in the case shown in the figure, the energy (negative) reaches a<br />

minimum. This fact indicates that the interaction is binding the two molecules: we have here<br />

a dimer with stabilization energy given, in first approximation, by the minimum value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

curve. Passing at shorter distances we reach region III; here the interaction rapidly increases<br />

and there it gives origin to repulsion between the two partners. Before making more comments,<br />

a remark must be added. The shape <strong>of</strong> the interaction energy function in molecular<br />

systems is quite complex: by selecting another path <strong>of</strong> approach and/or another orientation,<br />

a completely different shape <strong>of</strong> the curve could be obtained (for example, a completely repulsive<br />

curve). This is quite easy to accept: an example will suffice. The curve <strong>of</strong> Figure 8.1<br />

could correspond to the mutual approach <strong>of</strong> two water molecules, along a path leading to the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> a hydrogen bond when their orientation is appropriate: by changing the orientation<br />

bringing the oxygen atoms pointing against each other, the same path will correspond<br />

to a continuously repulsive curve (see Figure 8.2 below for an even simpler example). We<br />

have to consider paths <strong>of</strong> different shape, all the paths actually, and within each path we<br />

have to consider all the three regions. To describe a liquid, we need to know weak<br />

long-range interactions as well as strong short-range repulsion at the same degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy<br />

as for the intermediate region. Studies limited to the stabilization energies <strong>of</strong> the dimers<br />

are <strong>of</strong> interest in other fields <strong>of</strong> chemical interest, such as the modeling <strong>of</strong> drugs.<br />

The ΔE AB(R) function numerically corresponds to a small fraction <strong>of</strong> the whole QM<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> the dimeric system. It would appear to be computationally safer to compute ΔE directly<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> obtaining it as a difference, as done in the formal definition [8.11]. This can<br />

be done, and indeed in some cases it is done, but experience teaches us that algorithms starting<br />

from the energies <strong>of</strong> the dimer (or <strong>of</strong> the cluster) and <strong>of</strong> the monomers are simpler and<br />

eventually more accurate. The approaches making use <strong>of</strong> this difference can be designed as<br />

variational approaches, the others directly aiming at ΔE are called perturbation approaches,<br />

because use is made <strong>of</strong> the QM perturbation theory. We shall pay more attention, here be-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!