28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4 Measurement <strong>of</strong> solvent activity 191<br />

equilibrium is reached after both phases are sharply separated and clear, Rehage et al. 193 After<br />

separating both phases, concentrations and distribution functions were measured. Acceptable<br />

results can be obtained for low polymer concentrations (up to 20 wt%). Scholte and<br />

Koningsveld 194 developed a method for highly viscous polymer solutions at higher concentrations<br />

by constructing a modified ultracentrifuge where the equilibrium is quickly established<br />

during cooling by action <strong>of</strong> gravitational forces. After some hours, concentrations,<br />

phase volume ratios and concentration differences can be determined. Rietfeld with his<br />

low-speed centrifuge 195 and Gordon with a centrifugal homogenizer 196 improved this technique<br />

and expanded its applicability up to polymer melts, e.g., Koningsveld et al. 197<br />

The methods for obtaining spinodal data have already been discussed above with the<br />

light scattering technique, please see Subchapter 4.4.3.2.2.<br />

Special methods are necessary to measure the critical point. For solutions <strong>of</strong><br />

monodisperse polymers, it is the maximum <strong>of</strong> the binodal. Binodals <strong>of</strong> polymer solutions<br />

can be rather broad and flat. The exact position <strong>of</strong> the critical point can be obtained by the<br />

method <strong>of</strong> the rectilinear diameter. Due to universality <strong>of</strong> critical behavior, a relation like<br />

Equation [4.4.56] is valid, deGennes: 198<br />

where:<br />

I II crit crit<br />

( ϕ2 −ϕ2) 2−ϕ2 ∝( 1−T<br />

T )<br />

1−α<br />

/ / [4.4.56]<br />

volume fraction <strong>of</strong> the polymer in coexisting phase I<br />

I<br />

ϕ 2<br />

II<br />

ϕ 2 volume fraction <strong>of</strong> the polymer in coexisting phase II<br />

crit<br />

ϕ 2 volume fraction <strong>of</strong> the polymer at the critical point<br />

T crit<br />

critical temperature<br />

α critical exponent<br />

and critical points can be obtained by using regression methods to fit LLE-data to Equation<br />

[4.4.56].<br />

For solutions <strong>of</strong> polydisperse polymers, such a procedure cannot be used because the<br />

critical concentration must be known in advance to measure its corresponding coexistence<br />

curve. Additionally, the critical point is not the maximum in this case but a point at the<br />

right-hand side shoulder <strong>of</strong> the cloud-point curve. Two different methods were developed to<br />

solve this problem, the phase-volume-ratio method, e.g., Koningsveld, 199 where one uses<br />

the fact that this ratio is exactly equal to one only at the critical point, and the coexistence<br />

concentration plot, e.g. Wolf, 200 I II<br />

where an isoplethal diagram <strong>of</strong> values <strong>of</strong> ϕ 2 and ϕ2 vs. ϕ02<br />

gives the critical point as the intersection point <strong>of</strong> cloud-point and shadow curves.<br />

Since LLE-measurements do not provide a direct result with respect to solvent activities,<br />

Equation [4.4.8] and the stability conditions are the starting points <strong>of</strong> data reduction. As<br />

pointed out above, the following explanations are reduced to the strictly binary solution <strong>of</strong> a<br />

monodisperse polymer. The thermodynamic stability condition with respect to demixing is<br />

given for this case by (see Prausnitz et al. 49 ):<br />

2 2 ( ∂ ΔmixG/ ∂ ϕ2)<br />

PT<br />

, > [4.4.57]<br />

0<br />

I II<br />

If this condition is not fulfilled between some concentrations ϕ2 and ϕ 2 , demixing is<br />

obtained and the minimum <strong>of</strong> the Gibbs free energy <strong>of</strong> mixing between both concentrations<br />

is given by the double tangent at the corresponding curve <strong>of</strong> ΔmixG vs. ϕ 2 , Equation [4.4.8].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!