28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13.1 Solvent effects on chemical reactivity 739<br />

ity scales being the Gutmann DN, the Kamlet and Taft β, and the Koppel and Palm B. The<br />

other class is said to reflect anion (or negative dipole’s end) solvation. This latter class includes<br />

the famous scales π*, α, E T(30), Z, and last but not least, the acceptor number AN.<br />

Summed up:<br />

Cation (or positive dipole’s end) solvation<br />

• Gutmann DN<br />

• Kamlet and Taft β<br />

• Koppel and Palm B (B*)<br />

Anion (and negative dipole’s end) solvation<br />

• Gutmann AN<br />

• Dimroth and Reichardt E T(30)<br />

• Kosower Z<br />

• Kamlet and Taft α, π*<br />

These two sets <strong>of</strong> scales agree in their general trend, but are <strong>of</strong>ten at variance when values<br />

for any two particular solvents are taken. Some intercorrelations have been presented by<br />

Taft et al., e.g., the parameters E T, AN and Z can be written as linear functions <strong>of</strong> both α and<br />

π*. 8 Originally, the values <strong>of</strong> E T and π* were conceived as microscopic polarity scales reflecting<br />

the “local” polarity <strong>of</strong> the solvent in the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> solutes (“effective” dielectric<br />

constant in contrast to the macroscopic one). In the framework <strong>of</strong> the<br />

donor-acceptor concept, however, they obtained an alternative meaning, based on the interrelationships<br />

found between various scales. Along these lines, the common solvents may be<br />

separated into six classes as follows.<br />

1 nonpolar aliphatic solvents<br />

2 protics or protogenetic solvents (at least one hydrogen atom is bonded<br />

to oxygen)<br />

3 aromatic solvents<br />

4 (poly)halogenated solvents<br />

5 (perhaps) amines<br />

6 select (or “normal” according to Abraham) solvents defined as non-protonic,<br />

non-chlorinated, aliphatic solvents with a single dominant bond dipole.<br />

A case study is the plot <strong>of</strong> AN<br />

versus E T shown in Figure 13.1.2.<br />

While there is a quite good correspondence<br />

for the select solvents<br />

(and likely for the nonpolar<br />

aliphatic solvents), the other<br />

classes are considerably <strong>of</strong>f-line. 9<br />

Figure 13.1.2. Relationship between the E T(30) values and the acceptor<br />

number [from ref. 21]. Triangles: protic solvents, squares: aromatic<br />

and chlorinated solvents.<br />

This behavior may be interpreted<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> different<br />

solvation mechanisms such as<br />

electronic polarizability, dipole<br />

density, and/or hydrogen-bonding<br />

(HB) ability. For instance, the<br />

main physical difference between<br />

π* and E T(30), in the absence <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!