28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

780 Michelle L. Coote and Thomas P. Davis<br />

true even in bulk copolymerization, if either <strong>of</strong> the monomers exerts a direct effect or if<br />

strong cosolvency behavior causes preferential solvation. A number <strong>of</strong> models have been<br />

proposed to describe the effect <strong>of</strong> solvents on the composition, microstructure and propagation<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> copolymerization. In deriving each <strong>of</strong> these models, an appropriate base model<br />

for copolymerization kinetics is selected (such as the terminal model or the implicit or explicit<br />

penultimate models), and a mechanism by which the solvent influences the propagation<br />

step is assumed. The main mechanisms by which the solvent (which may be one or both<br />

<strong>of</strong> the comonomers) can affect the propagation kinetics <strong>of</strong> free-radical copolymerization reactions<br />

are as follows:<br />

(1) Polarity effect<br />

(2) Radical-solvent complexes<br />

(3) Monomer-solvent complexes<br />

(4) Bootstrap effect<br />

In this chapter we explain the origin <strong>of</strong> these effects, show how copolymerization<br />

models for these different effects may be derived, and review the main experimental evidence<br />

for and against these models. Throughout this review the baseline model for<br />

copolymerization is taken as the terminal or Mayo-Lewis model. 30 This model can be used<br />

to derive well-known expressions for copolymer composition and copolymerization propagation<br />

kinetics. Deviations from this model have <strong>of</strong>ten been interpreted in terms <strong>of</strong> either<br />

solvent effects or penultimate unit effects, although the two are by no means mutually exclusive.<br />

Deviations which affect both the copolymer composition and propagation kinetics<br />

have been termed explicit effects by Fukuda 31 in deriving penultimate unit models, whereas<br />

deviations from the kinetics without influencing the copolymer composition have been<br />

termed implicit effects. In this review we use the same terminology with respect to solvent<br />

effects: that is, a solvent effect on kp only is termed an implicit solvent effect, while a solvent<br />

effect on composition, microstructure and kp is termed explicit. The relatively recent discovery<br />

by Fukuda and co-workers 32 <strong>of</strong> the seemingly general failure <strong>of</strong> the terminal model<br />

to predict kp, even for bulk copolymerizations that follow the terminal model composition<br />

equation, led them to propose an implicit penultimate unit effect as a general phenomenon<br />

in free-radical copolymerization kinetics. We conclude this review with a brief examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the possibility that a implicit solvent effect, and not an implicit penultimate unit effect,<br />

may instead be responsible for this failure <strong>of</strong> the terminal model kp equation.<br />

13.2.3.1 Polarity effect<br />

13.2.3.1.1 Basic mechanism<br />

One type <strong>of</strong> solvent effect on free-radical addition reactions such as the propagation step <strong>of</strong><br />

free-radical polymerization is the so-called ‘polarity effect’. This type <strong>of</strong> solvent effect is<br />

distinguished from other solvent effects, such as complexation, in that the solvent affects<br />

the reactivity <strong>of</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> propagation steps without directly participating in the<br />

reaction. The mechanism by which this could occur may be explained as follows. The transition<br />

states <strong>of</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> propagation steps in a free-radical copolymerization<br />

may be stabilized by charge transfer between the reacting species. The amount <strong>of</strong> charge<br />

transfer, and hence the amount <strong>of</strong> stabilization, is inversely proportional to the energy difference<br />

between the charge transfer configuration, and the product and reactant configurations<br />

that combine to make up the wave function at the transition state. 33 Clearly, the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the charge transfer configuration would differ between the cross- and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!