28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23.2 Remediation technologies 1629<br />

Figure 23.2.7. Schematic <strong>of</strong> a permeable reactive barrier. [From Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for<br />

Contaminant Remediation, EPA/600/R-98/125, 1998].<br />

mary groundwater contaminants were TCE, PCE and cis-1,2-DCE (cDCE). The lithology<br />

<strong>of</strong> the site has been characterized as alluvial-fluvial clay, silt, sand and gravel, with an aquifer<br />

extending 5 to 60 ft below ground surface. The lithology is complex in this region and<br />

separates the aquifer into two zones with a discontinuous semi-confining aquitard. The<br />

mixed TCE, PCE, cDCE plume was ca. 10,000 ft by 5,000 ft extending along the direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> groundwater flow. Prior to installation <strong>of</strong> the permeable barrier system, TCE levels exceeded<br />

5,000 μg/L, PCE 1,000 μg/L. A permeable reactive barrier was constructed with the<br />

dimensions 10 ft wide, 6 ft long, and 25 ft deep witha2ftpeagravel layer in front <strong>of</strong> and behind<br />

the cell. The cell was filled with granular zero-valent iron and a steel corrugate wall<br />

was constructed on each <strong>of</strong> the sides <strong>of</strong> the cell to form a funnel redirecting groundwater<br />

flow in that area through the iron cell. After nearly 4 years <strong>of</strong> operation, monitoring wells<br />

down gradient <strong>of</strong> the permeable barrier continue to shown non-detect for CHCs.<br />

23.2.4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> technologies and strategies for managing hydrocarbon remediation.<br />

We have reviewed a number <strong>of</strong> the more promising, simple, and perhaps higher-technology<br />

solutions. However, a number <strong>of</strong> other demonstrated (pump and treat, air sparging) and<br />

emerging technologies do exist. 34 The basic themes <strong>of</strong> preventing migration passively, and<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> contaminant via degradation (biotic and abiotic) are seen in all the technologies.<br />

The proper use <strong>of</strong> particular technologies and strategies is very dependent on the extent and<br />

type <strong>of</strong> contamination, the site characteristics (hydrology, lithology, etc), the cleanup goals,<br />

and applicable regulations to name a few. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules for<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> a particular technology; past experience suggests that the more that is known<br />

about site characteristics the greater the success <strong>of</strong> technology application.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!