28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200 Christian Wohlfarth<br />

* * *<br />

P = P ψ + P ψ −ψ<br />

θ Χ [4.4.75a]<br />

1 1 2 2 1 2 12<br />

[ ( 1 1 1) ( 2 2 2)<br />

]<br />

* * * * * *<br />

T = P / P ψ / T + P ψ / T<br />

[4.4.75b]<br />

where the segment fractions ψi and the surface fractions θi have to be calculated according<br />

to:<br />

ψ i<br />

* *<br />

= nV i i / ∑nkVk<br />

*<br />

*<br />

= mV i spez, i / ∑mkVspez,<br />

k = xiri / ∑xkrk[4.4.76a]<br />

θi = ψisi / ∑ψksk<br />

[4.4.76b]<br />

where:<br />

mi mass <strong>of</strong> component i<br />

xi mole fraction <strong>of</strong> component i<br />

* *<br />

ri number <strong>of</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> component i, here with ri /rk = Vi / Vk<br />

and r1 =1<br />

si number <strong>of</strong> contact sites per segment (proportional to the surface area per segment)<br />

Now it becomes clear from Equation [4.4.74] that the classical Flory-Huggins χ-func-<br />

2 residual<br />

tion (χψ 2 = ln a 1 ) varies with composition, as found experimentally. However, to calculate<br />

solvent activities by applying this model, a number <strong>of</strong> parameters have to be<br />

considered. The characteristic parameters <strong>of</strong> the pure substances have to be obtained by fitting<br />

to experimental PVT-data as explained above. The number <strong>of</strong> contact sites per segment<br />

can be calculated from Bondi’s surface-to-volume parameter tables 264 but can also be used<br />

as fitting parameter. The X12-interaction parameter has to be fitted to experimental data <strong>of</strong><br />

the mixture. Fitting to solvent activities, e.g. Refs., 265,266 does not always give satisfactorily<br />

results. Fitting to data for the enthalpies <strong>of</strong> mixing gives comparable results. 266 Fitting to excess<br />

volumes alone does not give acceptable results. 142 Therefore, a modification <strong>of</strong> Equation<br />

[4.4.74] was made by Eichinger and Flory 142 *<br />

2<br />

by appending the term -(V1 / R)Q12θ<br />

2<br />

where the parameter Q12 represents the entropy <strong>of</strong> interaction between unlike segments and<br />

is an entropic contribution to the residual chemical potential <strong>of</strong> the solvent. By adjusting the<br />

parameter Q12, a better representation <strong>of</strong> solvent activities can be obtained.<br />

There are many papers in the literature that applied the Prigogine-Flory-Patterson theory<br />

to polymer solutions as well as to low-molecular mixtures. Various modifications and<br />

improvements were suggested by many authors. Sugamiya 267 introduced polar terms by<br />

adding dipole-dipole interactions. Brandani 268 discussed effects <strong>of</strong> non-random mixing on<br />

the calculation <strong>of</strong> solvent activities. Kammer et al. 269 added a parameter reflecting differences<br />

in segment size. Shiomi et al. 270,271 assumed non-additivity <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> external<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom with respect to segment fraction for mixtures and assumed the sizes <strong>of</strong><br />

hard-core segments in pure liquids and in solution to be different. Also Panayiotou 272 accounted<br />

for differences in segment size by an additional parameter. Cheng and Bonner 273<br />

modified the concept to obtain an equation <strong>of</strong> state which provides the correct zero pressure<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> the ideal gas. An attractive feature <strong>of</strong> the theory is its straightforward extension to<br />

multi-component mixtures, 274 requiring only parameters <strong>of</strong> pure components and binary<br />

ones as explained above. A general limitation is its relatively poor description <strong>of</strong> the compressibility<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> polymer melts, as well as its deficiencies regarding the description<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pressure dependence <strong>of</strong> thermodynamic data <strong>of</strong> mixtures.<br />

Dee and Walsh 249 developed a modified version <strong>of</strong> Prigogine’s cell model that provides<br />

an excellent description <strong>of</strong> the PVT-behavior <strong>of</strong> polymer melts:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!