28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

786 Michelle L. Coote and Thomas P. Davis<br />

wider solid angle. 80 The heavier mass <strong>of</strong> the complex would also serve to increase the<br />

pre-exponential factor.<br />

In addition to the four terminal model reactions, four complex addition reactions and<br />

an equilibrium constant are required to describe the system.<br />

k ij<br />

�<br />

RMi ⋅+ Mj ⎯⎯→RMiMj ⋅ where:, i j = 1or 2<br />

k iij<br />

RMi ⋅+ MiMj ⎯⎯→RMiMiMj ⋅ where:, i j = 1or 2and<br />

i ≠ j<br />

k iji<br />

RMi ⋅+ MiMj ⎯⎯→RMiMjMi ⋅ where:, i j = 1or 2and<br />

i ≠ j<br />

� � K<br />

M1 + M2 ←⎯→M1M2 The composition and propagation rate can be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the following parameters.<br />

31<br />

where:<br />

F<br />

F<br />

1<br />

2<br />

f<br />

=<br />

f<br />

kp<br />

=<br />

�<br />

1<br />

�<br />

2<br />

( AB) rf + ( AC) f<br />

( ) + ( )<br />

� �<br />

2 1 1 1 1 2 2<br />

� �<br />

1 2 2 2 2 1 1<br />

AB r f A C f<br />

( 2<br />

2<br />

1) 1( 2)<br />

+ ( 1<br />

2<br />

2) 2( 2)<br />

+ ( + )<br />

� � ( Arf 2 1 1 / k11)<br />

+ ( Ar 1 2f2 / k22)<br />

� � � �<br />

1 2 2 1 1 2<br />

A B r f AB r f AC A C f f<br />

A 1 =1+r 1s 1cQf 1 � and A2 =1+r 2s 2cQf 2 �<br />

B 1 =1+s 1c(1+r 1c -1 )Qf 2 � and B2 =1+s 2c(1+r 2c -1 )Qf 1 �<br />

C 1 =1+r 1s 1c(1+r 1c -1 )Qf 1 � and C2 =1+r 2s 2c(1+r 2c -1 )Qf 2 �<br />

2Qf i � = {[Q(fj -f i) +1] 2 +4Qf i} 1/2 - [Q(f i -f j) +1] and Q = k[M]<br />

f i is feed composition <strong>of</strong> Mi<br />

f i � = [Mi � ]/[M]<br />

r i =k ii/k ij; r ic =k iij/k iji; s ic =k iij/k ii where: i,j =1or2andi≠j<br />

The applicability <strong>of</strong> the MCP model to strongly alternating copolymerization has been<br />

a long standing point <strong>of</strong> contention. In essence, there are two opposing accounts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strongly alternating behavior observed in copolymers <strong>of</strong> electron-donor-acceptor (EDA)<br />

monomer pairs. In the first account, this behavior has been attributed to the fact that the<br />

transition state is stabilized in cross-propagation reaction and destabilized in the<br />

homopropagation. Deviations from the terminal model are caused merely by penultimate<br />

unit effects. In the second account -the MCP model- the strongly alternating behavior is a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> propagation <strong>of</strong> a 1:1 comonomer complex which, as seen above, also leads to deviations<br />

from the terminal model. An intermediate mechanism, which will be discussed<br />

shortly, is the MCD model in which the complex dissociates during the propagation step.<br />

The main approach to discriminating between these models has been to compare their ability<br />

to describe the copolymerization data <strong>of</strong> various explicit systems, and to study the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> added solvents on their behavior. Unfortunately, both approaches have led to inconclusive<br />

results.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!