28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

Handbook of Solvents - George Wypych - ChemTech - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.1 Theoretical treatment <strong>of</strong> solvent effects 659<br />

ΔEia = a − i − Jia + Kia a i Jia Kia<br />

⎧ ⎫<br />

⎨ ⎬ = − − +<br />

⎩ ⎭<br />

⎧ 2<br />

2<br />

0 0 ⎫<br />

ε ε ε ε ⎨ ⎬ −<br />

0<br />

⎩0⎭<br />

−Γψμψ � a<br />

ψ μψ � a<br />

− ψ μψ �<br />

[ i i ]<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

[11.1.62]<br />

where Jia and Kia are the respective Coulomb’ and exchange matrix elements and Γ is the re-<br />

0<br />

action field tensor at the dipole level. The terms ε i are the eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> the Fock operator<br />

for the k-th electron in the isolated solute molecule. The <strong>of</strong>f-diagonal CI matrix elements are<br />

given by<br />

� Γ � � � Γ � � [11.1.63]<br />

0 0<br />

HIJ = ψI H + ψμψ μψJ = ψI H ψJ − ψ0μψ0 ψI μψJ<br />

Equations [11.1.60] - [11.1.63] demonstrate that some part <strong>of</strong> the solvent effect is already<br />

included in the ordinary CI treatment when proceeding from the SCRF Fock matrix. It<br />

has to be noticed that the terms �ψ 0 |�μ|ψ 0 � should represent the ground-state dipole moment<br />

after CI, and therefore, an iterative procedure would be required to obtain a proper solution.<br />

However, at the CIS (CI single excitations) level, commonly used for the spectroscopic calculations,<br />

this is no concern because <strong>of</strong> Brillouin’s theorem, which implies that the CI does<br />

not change the dipole moment <strong>of</strong> the molecule. Even at higher levels <strong>of</strong> excitation in CI, this<br />

effect should not be large and might be estimated from the respective perturbation operator.<br />

27<br />

There are two approaches to address the instantaneous electronic polarization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solvent during the excitation <strong>of</strong> the solute molecule. In the first case, the following correction<br />

term has to be added to the CI excitation energy<br />

1<br />

2<br />

ΔE I = Γ(<br />

ε ) ⎡<br />

I I − ⎤<br />

∞ ψ0μψ � 0 ψ μψ � ψI μψ � I<br />

[11.1.64]<br />

2 ⎣⎢<br />

⎦⎥<br />

where Γ( ε∞ ) is the reaction field tensor for the optical relative dielectric permittivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solvent, ε ∞ . In the last equation, the first term removes the incorrect term arising from the<br />

SCRF orbitals and energies in forming the CI matrix whereas the second term adds the response<br />

<strong>of</strong> the electronic polarization <strong>of</strong> the solvent to the dipole <strong>of</strong> the excited state. Equation<br />

[11.1.64] is first order in electron relaxation. Higher orders can be examined by<br />

defining the perturbation<br />

X I ()<br />

( )<br />

= λΓ ε<br />

∞<br />

[ ψ � �<br />

0μψ0 − ψI μψI<br />

]<br />

2<br />

[11.1.65]<br />

which is clearly different for each excited state and would, if pursued, lead to a set <strong>of</strong> excited<br />

states that were nonorthogonal. In principle, these corrections need not to be small.<br />

Depending on the Fock operator used (equation [11.1.58] or [11.1.59]), the excitation<br />

energy from the ground state |ψ 0 � to the excited state |ψ I � <strong>of</strong> a solute molecule in a dielectric<br />

medium is given as follows<br />

[ ]<br />

A A<br />

1<br />

WI − W0<br />

= ψ I H� ψ I − ψ 0 H� ψ 0 + Γ ψ 0μ� ψ ψ Iμ� 0 ψ I − ψ 0μ� ψ 0 −<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!