LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OECD SIDS <strong>LINEAR</strong> <strong>ALKYLBENZENE</strong> <strong>SULFONATE</strong> (<strong>LAS</strong>)<br />
Remarks: This study is part of an extensive monitoring program executed jointly by the<br />
Dutch Soap Association (NVZ) and the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial<br />
Planning and the Environment (VROM). The authors indicate that field<br />
studies suggest that in-sewer removal can play a significant role in reducing<br />
the concentrations of surfactants entering the sewage treatment plant.<br />
Reference: Matthijs, E., Holt, M.S., Kiewiet, A., and Rijs, G.B.J. 1999. Environmental<br />
monitoring for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylate, alcohol<br />
ethoxy sulfate, alcohol sulfate, and soap. Environmental Toxicology and<br />
Chemistry 18:2634-2644.<br />
Reliability: 2 Valid with restrictions<br />
(e)<br />
Methods: <strong>LAS</strong> was monitored seasonally for one year (winter, spring, summer) in a<br />
small river in Spain receiving untreated sewage from a non-industrial village<br />
(Caserras). Sampling was carried out during November 1994, May 1995 and<br />
July 1995. Grab samples were collected in the morning, afternoon and<br />
evening at five sampling sites representing the raw sewage discharge, a predischarge<br />
location on the river, and three downstream locations on the river<br />
(1.5, 3.0 and 4.8 km downstream of the discharge).<br />
Results: Seasonal differences were observed in biodegradation, with total <strong>LAS</strong><br />
removals (dissolved and adsorbed) at 4.8 km downstream of 31.8%, 95.5%<br />
and 98.3% for winter, spring and summer respectively.<br />
Remarks: The seasonal differences in biodegradation are explained by hydraulic<br />
conditions. River flow rates are much greater in winter (75 m 3 /min) versus<br />
spring (4.5 m 3 /min) and summer (0.2 m 3 /min), which results in a much<br />
reduced hydraulic retention time (and thus less contact time for<br />
biodegradation) in winter of 1.6 hrs compared to 26.6 hrs in spring and 25<br />
days in summer. Overall, even in situations of direct discharge of untreated<br />
sewage, <strong>LAS</strong> biodegradation of >98% can be expected provided that the<br />
receiving water stream has adequate hydraulic conditions.<br />
Reference: de Ferrer, J., Moreno, A., Vaquero, M.T. and Comellas, L. 1997.<br />
Monitoring of <strong>LAS</strong> in direct discharge situations. Tens. Surfactants Det.<br />
34:278-283.<br />
Reliability: 2 Valid with restrictions<br />
(f)<br />
Results: <strong>LAS</strong> removal of 98-99% and biodegradation of 80-84% was observed.<br />
Sulfophenyl carboxylates (SPC) were found only in water and not the<br />
absorbed phases (sludge).<br />
Remarks: This study was conducted to specifically study <strong>LAS</strong> biodegradation in real<br />
WWTP conditions in Italy. <strong>LAS</strong> data was obtained by HPLC of influent,<br />
effluent, dissolved waters and sludges to reach a complete mass balance.<br />
Reference: 1) Cavalli, L., Gellera, A., Lazzarin, A., Nucci, G.C., Romano, P., Ranzani,<br />
M. and Lorenzi, E. 1991. Linear alkylbenzene sulphonate removal and<br />
biodegradation in a metropolitan plant for water treatment. Riv. Ital.<br />
Sostanze Grasse 68:75-81.<br />
2) Cavalli, L., Gellera, A. and Landone, A. 1993. <strong>LAS</strong> removal and<br />
biodegradation in a wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Toxicology<br />
and Chemistry 12:1777-1788.<br />
Reliability: 2 Valid with restrictions<br />
B. Other information<br />
(a)<br />
<strong>UNEP</strong> PUBLICATIONS 173