24.03.2013 Views

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OECD SIDS <strong>LINEAR</strong> <strong>ALKYLBENZENE</strong> <strong>SULFONATE</strong> (<strong>LAS</strong>)<br />

most sensitive endpoint and resulted in NOEC value of 100 mg/kg dw for all three species. The<br />

EC50 values were 167, 289 and 316 mg/kg dw for the sorghum, sunflower and mung bean,<br />

respectively. Figge and Schoberl (1989) tested the effects of a defined mixture of <strong>LAS</strong><br />

(composition not reported) to several crop species. Studies were conducted in a “plant metabolism<br />

box” consisting of natural soil cores taken from two different ecosystems. Radiolabeled <strong>LAS</strong><br />

absorbed to digested sludge was incorporated into the soils, which were then planted with either<br />

grass, bush beans, radishes, or potatoes and maintained for either 76 or 106 days. The resulting<br />

NOEC values were 27.2 mg/kg dw for grass, beans and radishes, and 16.2 mg/kg dw for potatoes.<br />

Table 17. Results of <strong>LAS</strong> Exposure on Terrestrial Plants (in mg/kg dry weight) 1<br />

Species Endpoint EC10 EC50 NOEC Reference<br />

Grass, Beans, Radishes Biomass 27.2*<br />

Potatoes Biomass 16.2*<br />

Sorghum bicolour (crop<br />

sorghum)<br />

Helianthus annuus<br />

(sunflower)<br />

Phaseolus aureus (mung<br />

bean)<br />

1 Reliability of Studies = (2)<br />

* Highest concentration tested.<br />

Figge and Schoberl 1989,<br />

dossier 4.6.2b<br />

Figge and Schoberl 1989,<br />

dossier 4.6.2b<br />

Growth 167 100 Windeat 1987<br />

Growth 289 100 Windeat 1987<br />

Growth 316 100 Windeat 1987<br />

Additional terrestrial plant studies are included in the <strong>LAS</strong> dossier. The reliability of the NOEC<br />

and EC10 values for these additional studies could not be adequately assessed because the original<br />

studies were not available for review. Therefore, they are not included in Table 17.<br />

The potential for <strong>LAS</strong> and other surfactants to influence defoliation in coastal trees was reviewed in a<br />

literature review (Hamwijk 2002). In laboratory studies in which young trees are exposed to artificial<br />

sea spray, it has been demonstrated that the presence of surfactants at a concentration that causes a<br />

dynamic surface tension < 30 mN/m lead to an increased foliar penetration of NaCl via the stomata.<br />

For example, Grieve and Pitman (1978) examined the influence of surfactants on foliar NaCl uptake<br />

in Norfolk Island Pines (Araucaria heterophylla). Plants were exposed to seawater with different<br />

concentrations of <strong>LAS</strong>. At 10 mg/L of <strong>LAS</strong>, which corresponds with a reduced surface tension of 32<br />

mN/m, the Na + content in the foliage increased almost tenfold to a level of approximately 500 µmol/g<br />

dw and damage symptoms were recorded. It was found that a low surface tension increases the<br />

contact angle with the leave and makes it possible for an aqueous solution to enter the stomata.<br />

Richard et al. (1996) reported the results of a 2-minute exposure of pine trees (Pinus halepensis) to<br />

14 C-<strong>LAS</strong> (58 mg/L). <strong>LAS</strong> was primarily absorbed in the epicuticular waxes of the pine needles with<br />

very little in other plant material. The amount of absorption, and changes in wax fine structure<br />

(SEM), was much greater for <strong>LAS</strong> in seawater (where surface tension = 29 mN/m) than in distilled<br />

water (surface tension = 45 mN/m). However, the concentrations of <strong>LAS</strong> in seawater (section 2.2.8)<br />

are much lower than those required to increase foliar penetration in these studies, suggesting that this<br />

mechanism may not be relevant to coastal tree defoliation.<br />

<strong>UNEP</strong> PUBLICATIONS 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!