24.03.2013 Views

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OECD SIDS <strong>LINEAR</strong> <strong>ALKYLBENZENE</strong> <strong>SULFONATE</strong> (<strong>LAS</strong>)<br />

produce large particle sizes. These large particles are needed for efficient delivery of the spray to<br />

the surface being cleaned. This results in particle sizes that are much larger than the respirable<br />

particle sizes used in testing and therefore would not be able to reach far into the lungs where<br />

effects could occur. A study conducted for the Soap and Detergent Association (Battelle 1999)<br />

measured the under 10 micron fraction delivered from 6 consumer product spray nozzles. The<br />

overall mean (n=30) is 0.11% particles under 10 microns and the standard deviation is 0.21. The<br />

very highest observation was 0.80% particles under 10 microns. This testing only captured the<br />

spray particles that are under 600 microns, so the actual mean respirable particle percent of total<br />

volume sprayed is less than 0.1%. The Battelle (1999) study also reported that for consumer spray<br />

products in normal use conditions, the peak breathing zone concentration under 10 microns ranged<br />

from 0.13-0.72 mg/m 3 . HERA (2004) reported that measurements of aerosol particles under 6.4<br />

microns in size generated upon spraying with typical surface cleaning spray products resulted in a<br />

product concentration of 0.35 mg/m 3 .<br />

Inhalation of detergent dust during washing processes was modelled by HERA (2004) and found to<br />

be 10-fold lower than the exposure from inhalation of aerosols from cleaning sprays. This estimate<br />

is based on a study reporting an average release of 0.27 µg dust per cup of product used for machine<br />

laundering (Hendricks, 1970). This is a conservative (protective) estimate as exposure from modern<br />

compact/granular detergent formulations produced in agglomeration processes would be expected<br />

to be much less.<br />

These estimates of exposure to respirable particles from consumer and industrial products indicate<br />

that inhalation is not a likely route of concern for human exposure (see SIAR Annex 1 and dossier<br />

section 1.10B(b) and (c) for more information). 2<br />

3 HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS<br />

3.1 Effects on Human Health<br />

3.1.1 Toxicokinetics, Metabolism and Distribution<br />

Studies in Animals<br />

The absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of <strong>LAS</strong> has been studied in several<br />

species, including rats, mice, guinea pigs, pigs, and rhesus monkeys (Debane 1978; Michael 1968;<br />

Havermann and Menke 1959; Cresswell et al. 1978; Sunakawa et al. 1979). <strong>LAS</strong> was administered<br />

either topically (i.e., dermally) or orally. Results showed that <strong>LAS</strong> can be absorbed from the<br />

gastrointestinal tract. Absorbed <strong>LAS</strong> is then metabolized and excreted without accumulation in the<br />

major tissues or fat.<br />

Debane (1978) found that when 0.2 to 0.5% <strong>LAS</strong> was topically applied once to the back skin of rats<br />

and guinea pigs, approximately 0.1 to 0.6% was absorbed. No accumulation was observed in<br />

specific organs and <strong>LAS</strong> was quickly excreted in the urine after being metabolized. IPCS (1996)<br />

notes that prolonged contact with the skin may compromise the integrity of the epidermal barrier,<br />

thereby potentially permitting greater absorption from this route. Michael (1968) found that <strong>LAS</strong><br />

administered orally as an aqueous solution was readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (80-<br />

90% of the dose). Most of the absorbed dose was eliminated within 72 hours and 60-65% was<br />

2 US EPA did not evaluate the modeling results in Annex 1 and therefore can make no conclusions regarding these<br />

values.<br />

<strong>UNEP</strong> PUBLICATIONS 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!