LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS) - UNEP Chemicals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OECD SIDS <strong>LINEAR</strong> <strong>ALKYLBENZENE</strong> <strong>SULFONATE</strong> (<strong>LAS</strong>)<br />
there were no abnormalities in body weight gain, organ weights or functions<br />
in the offspring.<br />
Method: <strong>LAS</strong> was fed in the diet to 16 pregnant female rats/dose from day 0 to 20 of<br />
gestation.<br />
GLP: Yes [ ] No [X] ? [ ]<br />
Test substance: Japan <strong>LAS</strong>; average alkyl chain length (based on <strong>LAS</strong> SIDS Consortium<br />
Survey, 2002) = C11.7-12.3.<br />
Remarks: Information as cited in IUCLID Data Sheet and IPCS document.<br />
Reference: 1) European Commission. 2000a. Benzenesulfonic acid, C10-13-alkyl derivs.,<br />
sodium salts. Year 2000 CD-ROM edition.<br />
2) Tiba, S., Shiobara, S., Imahori, A. and Kitagawa, T. 1976. Effects of<br />
linear alkylbenzene sulfonate on dam, fetus and newborn rat. J. Food Hyg.<br />
Soc. Jpn. 17:66-71. (In Japanese); cited in IPCS. 1996. Environmental<br />
Health Criteria 169: Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonates and Related<br />
Compounds. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Original<br />
article in Japanese.<br />
Reliability: 4 This study is assigned a reliability score of 4 because the original report<br />
was not available for review. However, the study was evaluated by IPCS<br />
prior to inclusion in their criteria document.<br />
(k)<br />
Species/strain: Weanling Charles River CD Sprague-Dawley albino rats and<br />
New Zealand rabbits<br />
Sex: Female [ ]; Male [ ]; Male/Female [X]; No data [ ]<br />
Administration: oral in feed<br />
Duration of the test: two generation (rats); one generation (rabbits)<br />
Exposure period: Rat: continuously or during organogenesis period of six pregnancies<br />
Rabbit: day 2-16 of gestation during a single pregnancy<br />
Frequency of treatment:continuous<br />
Doses: Rat: 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0% TAE3S/<strong>LAS</strong> (equivalent to 50, 250 or 500 mg/kg/day in<br />
female rats corresponding to <strong>LAS</strong> doses of 22.5, 112.5 and 225 mg/kg bw d.)<br />
Rabbit: 50, 100, or 300 mg/kg TAE3S/<strong>LAS</strong>, corresponding to <strong>LAS</strong> doses of<br />
22.5, 45, and 135 mg/kg bw d<br />
Control group: Yes [X]; No [ ]; No data [ ];<br />
Concurrent no treatment [X]; Concurrent vehicle [ ]; Historical [ ]<br />
NOAEL Maternal: 225 mg/kg bw d <strong>LAS</strong> (rat)<br />
135 mg/kg bw d <strong>LAS</strong> (rabbit)<br />
NOAEL teratogenicity: 225 mg/kg bw d <strong>LAS</strong> (rat)<br />
135 mg/kg bw d <strong>LAS</strong> (rabbit)<br />
Results: Maternal toxicity: No treatment related adverse effects were observed in the<br />
maternal generation of either rats or rabbits. Fetal toxicity: No treatmentrelated<br />
adverse effects were observed on conception, fetal viability or postnatal<br />
survival in either generation of rats. Some statistically significant<br />
differences were observed in live-born and surviving pup numbers, but there<br />
were no consistent trend or patterns. Combined with the high lactation index<br />
in all groups, indicating a very low mortality among the suckling rats, these<br />
differences were considered due to causes not related to treatment with the<br />
test material. There were no statistical differences among the groups of rat<br />
fetuses taken by Caesarian section and examined for birth defects. Some<br />
minor soft-tissue and skeletal anomalies were observed in rat fetuses from<br />
both generations. Of the 1210 rat fetuses, the overall incidence of abnormal<br />
young was 9.0% and did not vary significantly between treatment groups or<br />
the controls. Similarly, no treatment-related adverse effects were seen in<br />
rabbits treated with the surfactant mixture. Of the 855 rabbit fetuses, 5.7%<br />
were abnormal, but the incidence of defective fetuses in the test groups were<br />
not significantly different from those in controls. Therefore, no test related<br />
<strong>UNEP</strong> PUBLICATIONS 297