Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Binominal constructions 671
must at least be able to establish the identity of the woman involved in the relevant
event of wearing a dress.
4.3. Bibliographical notes
Probably the most exhaustive discussion of Dutch binominal, partitive and pseudopartitive
constructions, discussed in Section 4.1, can be found in Vos (1999). More
discussion of the quantificational binominal construction can be found in
Paardekooper (1952), Putter (1976), Bennis (1978), Van Gestel (1986), and
Barbiers (1990). For a discussion of similar constructions in other languages, see
Löbel (1986/1989), Bhatt (1990), Delsing (1991), and Alexiadou et al. (2007: Part
III, ch.2). More discussion on the partitive and pseudo-partitive constructions can be
found in Hoeksema (1984b/1996), Coppen (1991), De Jong (1991) and De Hoop
(2003). It is important to repeat here that the notion pseudo-partitive construction as
used in this chapter differs from the one used in the literature, where it is often used
to refer to what we have called quantificational binominal constructions, that is,
constructions like een kop koffie ‘a cup of coffee’.
The discussion of the N van een N construction in Section 4.2 is mainly based
on Paardekooper (1956), Everaert (1992), and, especially, Den Dikken (1995b) and
Bennis et al. (1998). The last two articles are also a major source for the discussion
of the wat voor construction in Section 4.2.2. Other important studies on this
construction are: Bennis (1983/1995), Den Besten (1985), Corver (1990/1991), De
Hoop & Kosmeijer (1991), Broekhuis (1992), Aarts (1994), Beermann (1997),
Honcoop (1998), and Alexiadou et al. (2007: Part III, ch.2).