15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

696 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

the same age, <strong>and</strong> in (45b) a prototypical girl from the polder <strong>and</strong> a prototypical girl<br />

from the city. It seems, however, that even in these cases the use <strong>of</strong> an indefinite<br />

noun phrase, as in the primed examples, is much preferred by most speakers.<br />

(45) a. Het meisje is op die leeftijd volwassener dan de jongen.<br />

the girl is at that age more mature than the boy<br />

a′. Meisjes zijn op die leeftijd volwassener dan jongens.<br />

girls are at that age more mature than boys<br />

b. Het meisje uit de polder is volwassener dan het meisje uit de stad.<br />

the girl from the polder is more mature than the girl from the city<br />

b′. Meisjes uit de polder zijn volwassener dan meisjes uit de stad.<br />

girls from the polder are more mature than girls from the city<br />

The generic interpretation <strong>of</strong> the noun phrases in the primeless examples in (45) is<br />

clearly facilitated by the use <strong>of</strong> the modifiers: in (45a) the use <strong>of</strong> the adverbial<br />

phrase op die leeftijd ‘at that age’ <strong>and</strong> in (45b) by the attributively used PP uit de<br />

polder/stad ‘from the polder/city’. That attributive modifiers make the generic<br />

reading more readily available is also clear from the examples in (46). Perhaps the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the attributive modifier gebonden makes a prototypical reading more readily<br />

available due to the fact that it divides the superset <strong>of</strong> books into two subsets, so<br />

that we can compare the prototypical members <strong>of</strong> these subsets: the prototypical<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> bound books is unaffordable, in contrast to the prototypical<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> paperbacks or pocket books.<br />

(46) a. *? Het boek is tegenwoordig onbetaalbaar.<br />

the book is nowadays unaffordable<br />

b. Het gebonden boek is tegenwoordig onbetaalbaar.<br />

the bound book is nowadays unaffordable<br />

This probably also accounts for the fact that classes that are relatively high in the<br />

speaker’s taxonomy are normally not preceded by a definite article in generic<br />

sentences. Example like (47a) contrast sharply with examples like (43b): the fact<br />

that mammals are higher in the taxonomy than zebras apparently makes it easier for<br />

the speaker to picture a prototypical zebra than a prototypical mammal. Reference<br />

to a typical member is easier, <strong>and</strong> hence the use <strong>of</strong> an indefinite article, as in<br />

(47b&c), is preferred.<br />

(47) a. % Het zoogdier is warmbloedig.<br />

the mammal is warm.blooded<br />

b. Een zoogdier is warmbloedig.<br />

a mammal is warm.blooded<br />

c. Zoogdieren zijn warmbloedig.<br />

mammals are warm.blooded<br />

From the discussion above, we may perhaps conclude that the ambiguity between<br />

the regular referential reading <strong>and</strong> the generic reading <strong>of</strong> a singular definite noun<br />

phrase is related to the question <strong>of</strong> whether the language user is able to interpret the<br />

noun phrase as referring to a prototype <strong>of</strong> a certain set <strong>of</strong> entities (where many nonlinguistic<br />

aspects may play a role).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!