15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

794 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

sommige(n) ‘some’, vele(n) ‘many’ <strong>and</strong> alle(n) ‘all’ are also categorized as personal<br />

pronouns. However, since these forms can be considered nominalizations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corresponding quantificational modifiers, they will be discussed in Section 6.2.<br />

I. Meaning<br />

The easiest way <strong>of</strong> explaining the core meaning <strong>of</strong> quantification personal pronouns<br />

is by using Figure 1 from Section 1.1.2.2.1, repeated below, to represent the<br />

subject-predicate relation in a clause. In this figure “A” represents the set denoted<br />

by the subject NP <strong>and</strong> “B” the set denoted by the verb phrase. The intersection<br />

A ∩ B denotes the set <strong>of</strong> entities for which the proposition expressed by the clause<br />

is claimed to be true. In an example like Jan w<strong>and</strong>elt op straat, for example, it is<br />

claimed that the set denoted by A, viz. {Jan}, is properly included in set B, which is<br />

constituted by the people walking in the street. In other words, it expresses that A -<br />

(A ∩ B) = ∅.<br />

A B<br />

A ∩ B<br />

Figure 1: Set-theoretic representation <strong>of</strong> the subject-predicate relation<br />

In the discussion below we will not be interested in the fact that the [+HUMAN]<br />

<strong>and</strong> [-HUMAN] pronouns are associated with two mutually exclusive denotation sets:<br />

with the former, set A is a (possibly contextually defined) set <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />

whereas with the latter set A is a (possibly contextually defined) set <strong>of</strong> non-human<br />

entities. We will rather focus on the implication <strong>of</strong> the pronouns for the intersection<br />

A ∩ B <strong>and</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> set A, that is, A - (A ∩ B).<br />

The existential pronouns iem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> iets behave similarly to indefinite noun<br />

phrases in that they indicate that A ∩ B is not empty, <strong>and</strong> do not imply anything<br />

about the set A - (A ∩ B), which may or may not be empty.<br />

(335) a. Er loopt iem<strong>and</strong> op straat.<br />

there walks someone in the.street<br />

‘There is someone walking in the street.’<br />

a′. iem<strong>and</strong>: |A ∩ B| ≥ 1<br />

b. Er zit iets in die doos.<br />

there sits something in that box<br />

‘There is something in that box.’<br />

b′. iets: |A ∩ B| ≥ 1<br />

In contrast to what we did with singular indefinite noun phrases in Section 5.1.1.1,<br />

we follow the philosophical tradition here in assuming that these quantification<br />

pronouns have the cardinality ≥ 1. The reason for this is that the existential<br />

pronouns can be used in yes/no-questions without the implication that there is at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!