15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Numerals <strong>and</strong> quantifiers 923<br />

The examples in (156a&b) express that the cardinality <strong>of</strong> the set denoted by the<br />

noun does not satisfy the lower bound <strong>of</strong> the contextually determined norm. It is<br />

also possible to express that the cardinality exceeds the upper bound <strong>of</strong> this norm by<br />

using the complex phrase meer dan genoeg/voldoende ‘more than enough’; zat<br />

sounds somewhat marked (although we found a couple <strong>of</strong> cases on the internet). A<br />

more extensive discussion <strong>of</strong> examples like (158a) can be found in Section 6.2.5.<br />

(158) a. Hij heeft meer dan genoeg/voldoende boeken.<br />

he has more than enough books<br />

‘He has more than enough books.’<br />

b. ? Hij heeft meer dan zat boeken.<br />

he has more than plenty books<br />

6.2.4.2. Use as argument<br />

This section discusses the use <strong>of</strong> the degree quantifiers as independent arguments.<br />

As in the previous section, we will discuss the high/low degree quantifiers veel <strong>and</strong><br />

weinig, <strong>and</strong> the degree quantifiers voldoende, genoeg <strong>and</strong> zat, which indicate that<br />

some tacitly assumed norm is met, in separate subsections.<br />

I. High <strong>and</strong> low degree quantifiers<br />

This section will make a distinction between uninflected <strong>and</strong> inflected veel/weinig<br />

<strong>and</strong> show that these two instances differ in several respects.<br />

A. Uninflected veel <strong>and</strong> weinig<br />

Like most existential quantifiers, the degree quantifiers veel <strong>and</strong> weinig are<br />

normally not used as independent arguments: example (159b) is acceptable due to<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> °quantitative er, but example (159c), in which the quantifier is truly<br />

independent, is unacceptable.<br />

(159) a. Er lopen veel/weinig jongens op straat.<br />

there walk many/few boys in the.street<br />

b. Er lopen er [veel/weinig [e]] op straat.<br />

there walk ER many/few in the.street<br />

c. *Er lopen veel/weinig op straat.<br />

there walk many/few in the.street<br />

Things are different, however, when we are dealing with non-count nouns. Since the<br />

quantitative er construction requires the empty noun to be plural, it does not really<br />

come as a surprise that example (160b) is excluded. However, in contrast to (159c),<br />

(160c) is acceptable. This example can be construed with a count noun interpretation,<br />

in which case veel/weinig can refer to a certain quantity <strong>of</strong> wine.<br />

Alternatively, veel/weinig may be construed as referring to a set <strong>of</strong> discrete entities<br />

<strong>of</strong> a miscellaneous sort (“loads <strong>of</strong> different things”).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!