15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

580 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

again that the QC can only occur in clause-initial position when N1 has a referential<br />

reading.<br />

The ambiguity described above may only arise when the descriptive content <strong>of</strong><br />

N1 is weak: it is hard to determine what the denotation set <strong>of</strong> nouns like boel ‘a lot’,<br />

aantal ‘number’, kilo ‘kilo’ <strong>and</strong> liter ‘liter’ is. When the N1 does have a clear<br />

descriptive content, like the collective <strong>and</strong> container nouns in (14), agreement with<br />

this noun is strongly preferred.<br />

(14) a. Een kudde olifanten gaat/ *? gaan voorbij.<br />

a herd [<strong>of</strong>] elephants passes/pass prt.<br />

b. Er ligt/*liggen een zakje snoepjes op tafel.<br />

there lies/lie a bag [<strong>of</strong>] sweets on the.table<br />

Part nouns like reep ‘bar’ in (15) also seem to have descriptive content, <strong>and</strong> we<br />

therefore expect them to trigger agreement on the verb. This is indeed the case<br />

although we cannot show this solely by appealing to the agreement facts because<br />

part nouns are always used in combination with a substance noun, which triggers<br />

singular agreement on the verb: the fact that the verb in (15a) is singular therefore<br />

does not tell us much. The plural agreement in (15b), <strong>of</strong> course, conclusively shows<br />

that N1 can act as the syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the construction, but, since we have seen in<br />

(13a) that the verb must agree with plural N1s, this still does not suffice to exclude<br />

the possibility that N2 may function as the syntactic head in (15a). However, the fact<br />

that the part noun counterpart <strong>of</strong> (13b), given in (15c), is unacceptable seems<br />

sufficient to conclude that the part nouns must function as the syntactic head <strong>of</strong> a<br />

QC: if N2 can act as the syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the construction, this example should be<br />

grammatical.<br />

(15) a. Er ligt een reep chocola op tafel.<br />

there lies a bar [<strong>of</strong>] chocolate on the.table<br />

‘There is a bar <strong>of</strong> chocolate on the table.’<br />

b. Er liggen/*ligt twee repen chocola op tafel.<br />

there lie/lies two bars [<strong>of</strong>] chocolate on the.table<br />

‘There are two bars <strong>of</strong> chocolate on the table.’<br />

c. *Er ligt/liggen twee reep chocola op tafel.<br />

there lies/lie two bar [<strong>of</strong>] chocolate on the.table<br />

The examples in (10) to (15) have shown that the number features that trigger<br />

number agreement on the finite verb can be either situated on N2 or on N1. The<br />

actual choice seems related to whether N1 is referential or purely quantificational. A<br />

purely quantificational noun like boel ‘lot’ in (10) apparently does not have the<br />

necessary features to trigger agreement on the verb, whereas referential nouns like<br />

the collective noun kudde ‘herd’ in (14a) or the part noun reep ‘bar’ in (15) do have<br />

these features. Other nouns, like the measure noun liter, seem to have some<br />

intermediate status, <strong>and</strong> the question whether they trigger agreement on the verb or<br />

not depends on whether they have a purely quantificational or a more referential<br />

function.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!