15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1070 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

referring to several separate events <strong>of</strong> inviting a student or subgroup <strong>of</strong> students,<br />

whereas (43b) strongly favors the latter interpretation. This meaning difference is<br />

probably related to the scope <strong>of</strong> the modal adverb waarschijnlijk ‘probably’. In<br />

(43b) the universally quantified phrase is outside the scope <strong>of</strong> the modal adverb,<br />

<strong>and</strong>, as a result, it is claimed for each individual student that he will probably be<br />

invited. In (43a), on the other h<strong>and</strong>, the universally quantified phrase is within the<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> the modal adverb, <strong>and</strong>, as a result, it is claimed that it is probably the case<br />

that all students will be invited, where it is immaterial whether they are invited<br />

individually or as a group. The universal quantifiers iedereen ‘everyone’ <strong>and</strong> alles<br />

‘everything’ also seem to prefer the position to the right <strong>of</strong> the modal adverb, but<br />

again both orders seem to be acceptable.<br />

(44) a. dat Jan waarschijnlijk iedereen/alles meeneemt.<br />

that Jan probably everyone/everything prt.-takes<br />

‘that Jan probably takes everyone/everything with him.’<br />

b. ? dat Jan iedereen/alles waarschijnlijk meeneemt.<br />

Universally quantified nominal objects can readily occur on both sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adverbs <strong>of</strong> frequency. This gives rise to a difference in interpretation, which can<br />

again be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> scope: in (45a′), the universally quantified noun<br />

phrase is outside the scope <strong>of</strong> the adverb, <strong>and</strong> as a result it is claimed for each<br />

individual book in the relevant domain <strong>of</strong> discourse that John <strong>of</strong>ten takes it with<br />

him; in (45a), on the other h<strong>and</strong>, the universally quantified noun phrase is within the<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> the frequency adverb, <strong>and</strong> as a result it is claimed that it is <strong>of</strong>ten the case<br />

that John takes all books with him. Examples (45b&b′) show that the same thing<br />

holds for universal quantifiers such as alles ‘everything’.<br />

(45) a. dat Jan vaak alle boeken meeneemt.<br />

that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten all books prt.-takes<br />

‘that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten takes all books with him.’<br />

a′. dat Jan alle boeken vaak meeneemt.<br />

b. dat Jan vaak alles meeneemt.<br />

that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten everything prt.-takes<br />

‘that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten takes everything with him.’<br />

b′. ? dat Jan alles vaak meeneemt.<br />

C. Negative quantifiers<br />

Given that the negative quantifiers niem<strong>and</strong> ‘nobody’ <strong>and</strong> niets ‘nothing’ do not<br />

allow a specific interpretation, it does not come as a surprise that such noun phrases<br />

must follow the modal adverbs, as is illustrated by (46a&b). Another factor that<br />

may play a role here is that, in general, negative phrases tend to follow the modal<br />

adverbs. This even holds for subjects, as is shown in (46c).<br />

(46) a. dat Jan waarschijnlijk uitnodigt.<br />

that Jan nobody probably invites<br />

b. dat Jan waarschijnlijk aan Peter wil geven.<br />

that Jan nothing probably to Peter wants give<br />

c. dat < ?? niem<strong>and</strong>> waarschijnlijk dat boek gelezen heeft.<br />

that nobody probably that book read has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!