15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(325) a. Op wie wacht je?<br />

for who wait you<br />

‘For whom are you waiting?’<br />

b. *? Op wat wacht je?<br />

for what wait you<br />

b′. Waar wacht je op?<br />

where wait you for<br />

‘What are you waiting for?’<br />

Determiners: articles <strong>and</strong> pronouns 791<br />

The primeless examples in (326) show that wie <strong>and</strong> wat can also function as<br />

nominal predicates in copular constructions. This is, however, not possible in the<br />

vinden construction, as is shown in the primed examples.<br />

(326) a. Wie is hij?<br />

who is he<br />

a′. *Wie vind je hem?<br />

who consider you him<br />

b. Wat wil je later worden?<br />

what want you later be<br />

‘What do you want to be later?’<br />

b′. ?? Wat vind je hem, een dwaas <strong>of</strong> een genie?<br />

who consider you him a fool or a genius<br />

Note that we do find examples like (327), but this case is rather special in that wat<br />

seems to question a property: at least, a typical answer to this question would<br />

involve an adjectival predicate <strong>and</strong> not a nominal one. Another special use <strong>of</strong> wat is<br />

illustrated in (327b), where it questions not an argument or a predicate, but a phrase,<br />

which is obligatorily present but behaves in various respects like an adjunct, for<br />

which reason it is <strong>of</strong>ten considered a quasi-argument <strong>of</strong> the verb; cf. Rizzi (1990).<br />

(327) a. Wat vind je van hem? Hij is aardig.<br />

what consider you <strong>of</strong> him he is nice<br />

‘What do you think <strong>of</strong> him? He is nice.’<br />

b. Wat weeg je? 65 kilo.<br />

what weigh you 65 kilos<br />

‘What do you weigh? 65 kilos.’<br />

Finally, note that the earlier mentioned restriction that wat cannot occur as the<br />

complement <strong>of</strong> a PP does not hold in echo-questions like (328a), in which the<br />

question word is stressed. In echo-questions contexts wat can also be used to as a<br />

request to repeat/clarify an earlier utterance; example (328b) shows that in this case<br />

wat sometimes alternates with the form watte.<br />

(328) a. Je wacht op WAT?<br />

you wait for what<br />

‘You are waiting for WHAT?’<br />

b. Ik zal de hond maar eens schoppen. WAT/WATTE?<br />

I will the dog prt. prt. kick what<br />

‘I think I will kick the dog. I BEG YOUR PARDON?’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!