15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Determiners: articles <strong>and</strong> pronouns 687<br />

B. Semantically implied entities<br />

Anyone hearing the sentence in (22) will conclude that the noun phrase de kleertjes<br />

‘the clothes’ refers to the clothes <strong>of</strong> the baby. This is due to the fact that the verb<br />

aankleden ‘to dress’ can be paraphrased as “putting clothes on someone”. The fact<br />

that the clothes <strong>of</strong> the baby are semantically implied by the description <strong>of</strong> the event<br />

in the first conjunct apparently makes it unnecessary to introduce the clothes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

baby by means <strong>of</strong> an indefinite noun phrase.<br />

(22) Jan wou de baby aankleden, maar de kleertjes waren nog nat.<br />

Jan wanted the baby prt.-dress but the clothes were still wet<br />

‘Jan wanted to dress the baby, but the clothes were still wet.’<br />

C. Inferable entities<br />

Appealing to the meaning <strong>of</strong> the verb aankleden does not account for the fact that<br />

the noun phrase de kleertjes in (22) can be replaced by the noun phrase de luiers<br />

‘the diapers’, as in (23). After all, the verb aankleden ‘to dress’ cannot be<br />

paraphrased as “putting diapers on someone”.<br />

(23) Jan wou de baby aankleden, maar de luiers waren nog nat.<br />

Jan wanted the baby prt.-dress but the diapers were still wet<br />

‘Jan wanted to dress the baby, but the diapers were still wet.’<br />

The fact that the definite article is acceptable in the second conjunct shows that<br />

language users have richly structured schemata <strong>of</strong> certain events at their disposal. A<br />

language user knows that babies generally wear diapers <strong>and</strong>, as a result, the event <strong>of</strong><br />

dressing a baby typically evokes the idea <strong>of</strong> diapers, which therefore need not be<br />

introduced by an indefinite noun phrase. These structured schemata are available<br />

not only for events but also for entities. Speakers know that a wedding involves a<br />

bride <strong>and</strong> a bridegroom, best man, a priest or a civil servant, etc. Therefore these<br />

entities need not be introduced by means <strong>of</strong> an indefinite noun phrase, but can be<br />

referred to directly by means <strong>of</strong> a definite noun phrase, as in (24a). Similarly, for<br />

many people the mere mention <strong>of</strong> a house is sufficient to evoke a picture <strong>of</strong> a<br />

building with a garden, a front door, a chimney, etc., <strong>and</strong> as is shown in (24b) these<br />

entities can be immediately referred to by means <strong>of</strong> a definite noun phrase.<br />

(24) a. Ik was daarnet bij een huwelijk. De bruid was gekleed in een lange witte jurk.<br />

I was just now at a wedding the bride was dressed in a long white dress<br />

b. Ik heb een huis in Tilburg gekocht. De tuin is heel groot.<br />

I have a house in Tilburg bought the garden is very big<br />

‘I bought a house in Tilburg. The garden is very big.’<br />

The acceptability <strong>of</strong> examples like (23) <strong>and</strong> (24) is, <strong>of</strong> course, due to the fact that<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the speaker’s <strong>and</strong> listener’s conceptions <strong>of</strong> reality are culturally determined,<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore have sufficient overlap to invoke the desired inferences in these<br />

examples.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!