15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Determiners: articles <strong>and</strong> pronouns 795<br />

most one individual/entity that satisfies the description provided by the verb phrase.<br />

This will be clear from the fact that the question-answers pairs given in (336)<br />

constitute a perfectly coherent piece <strong>of</strong> interaction.<br />

(336) a. Komt er vanavond iem<strong>and</strong>? Ja, Jan en Peter met hun partner.<br />

comes there tonight someone yes Jan <strong>and</strong> Peter with their partner<br />

‘Is there anyone coming tonight? Yes, Jan <strong>and</strong> Peter with their partner.’<br />

b. Zit er nog iets in die doos? Ja, een paar boeken.<br />

sits there still something in that box yes a couple <strong>of</strong> books<br />

‘Is there still something in that box? Yes, a couple <strong>of</strong> books.’<br />

Whereas the semantic contribution <strong>of</strong> the existential quantifiers resembles that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the indefinite noun phrases, the universal quantifiers instead resemble the definite<br />

noun phrase: they express that in the domain <strong>of</strong> discourse (domain D), all entities<br />

that satisfy the description <strong>of</strong> the pronoun (human/non-human) are included in the<br />

intersection A ∩ B, that is, that A - (A ∩ B) = ∅.<br />

(337) a. Iedereen loopt op straat.<br />

everyone walks in the.street<br />

a′. iedereen: A - (A ∩ B) = ∅ & |A ∩ B| ≥ 1<br />

b. Alles zit in de doos.<br />

everything is in the box<br />

b′. alles: A - (A ∩ B) = ∅ & |A ∩ B| ≥ 1<br />

Now that we have seen that the existential <strong>and</strong> the universal personal pronouns<br />

resemble noun phrases containing, respectively, an indefinite <strong>and</strong> a definite article,<br />

it will probably not come as a surprise that the negative existential personal<br />

pronouns resemble noun phrases containing the negative article geen: they express<br />

that the intersection (A ∩ B) is empty.<br />

(338) a. Er loopt niem<strong>and</strong> op straat.<br />

there walks no.one in the.street<br />

‘There is no one walking in the street.’<br />

a′. niem<strong>and</strong>: |A ∩ B| = ∅<br />

b. Er zit niets in die doos.<br />

there sits nothing in that box<br />

‘There is nothing in that box.’<br />

b′. niets: |A ∩ B| = ∅<br />

II. Number<br />

The examples in (339) <strong>and</strong> (340) show that the quantificational pronouns are,<br />

formally, third person, singular pronouns. This is clear from subject agreement with<br />

the finite verb, which must also be third person singular, <strong>and</strong> from the fact that the<br />

third person singular possessive pronoun zijn ‘his’ can take these pronouns as its<br />

antecedent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!