15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

578 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

4.1.1.2. The head <strong>of</strong> the quantificational binominal construction<br />

It is <strong>of</strong>ten not immediately clear whether N1 or N2 constitutes the head <strong>of</strong> a certain<br />

QC. This section argues that we have to distinguish the three types <strong>of</strong> QC in (9), <strong>and</strong><br />

discusses which types <strong>of</strong> N1s can enter into which types <strong>of</strong> QC. Some N1s may<br />

occur in more than one construction type; these N1s are <strong>of</strong>ten ambiguous between a<br />

reading as quantifier noun <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the other types in example (2) above.<br />

(9) • Quantificational binominal constructions<br />

a. Type 1: N2 is both the syntactic <strong>and</strong> the semantic head <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />

b. Type 2: N1 is the syntactic <strong>and</strong> N2 is the semantic head <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />

c. Type 3: N1 is both the syntactic <strong>and</strong> the semantic head <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />

4.1.1.2.1. Determining the syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />

This section provides two agreement tests to determine which N functions as the<br />

syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the binominal construction. These tests will also reveal that QCs<br />

are sometimes ambiguous in the sense that both N1 <strong>and</strong> N2 may function as the<br />

syntactic head.<br />

I. Subject-verb (number) agreement<br />

The first test focuses on the fact that the finite verb agrees in number with the<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> the clause. Given that the two nouns in the QC may differ in number, we<br />

can determine the syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the construction by looking at the number<br />

specification <strong>of</strong> the finite verb: the noun that the verb agrees with is the syntactic<br />

head. Example (10) illustrates this for the quantifier noun boel ‘a lot’ <strong>and</strong> the<br />

collective noun groep ‘group’. In (10a), the number specification on the finite verb<br />

clearly shows that we must consider the plural N2 studenten ‘students’ as the<br />

syntactic head <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>and</strong> not the singular N1 boel. In (10b), on the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, the singular agreement on the verb unambiguously shows that it is the<br />

singular N1 groep that acts as the syntactic head.<br />

(10) a. Er demonstreren/*demonstreert een boel studenten.<br />

there protestpl/protestssg a lot [<strong>of</strong>] students<br />

‘A lot <strong>of</strong> students are demonstrating.’<br />

b. Er demonstreert/*demonstreren een groep studenten.<br />

there protestssg/protestpl a group [<strong>of</strong>] students<br />

‘A group <strong>of</strong> students is demonstrating.’<br />

Since we have seen in Section 4.1.1.1 that the noun aantal is ambiguous between a<br />

quantifier <strong>and</strong> a collective reading, it is expected that QCs with this noun will show<br />

mixed behavior with respect to subject-verb agreement. The examples in (11) show<br />

that this expectation is indeed borne out. It must be noted, however, that the two<br />

examples seem to differ in their preferential agreement pattern: a search in the<br />

Corpus Gesproken Nederl<strong>and</strong>s by Van Eerten (2007) has pointed out that in<br />

examples like (11a) the majority <strong>of</strong> cases (76%) exhibit plural agreement, whereas<br />

in examples like (11b) there is a clear preference for singular agreement (70%).<br />

This may be related to the fact that the QC in (11) is indefinite, <strong>and</strong> that placement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!