15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(235) a. heel de/ (?) die/ ? deze/mijn stad<br />

all the/that/this/my town<br />

b. heel het/ (?) dat/ ? dit/mijn huis<br />

all the/that/this/my house<br />

Pre-determiners 1025<br />

The proximate demonstrative examples improve up to the point <strong>of</strong> full acceptability,<br />

however, in contrastive contexts <strong>of</strong> the type in (236). Constructions <strong>of</strong> the type in<br />

(236a) can be normally be “simplified” by Backward °Conjunction Reduction <strong>and</strong><br />

NP-ellipsis, but they deliver robustly different results in the context <strong>of</strong> predeterminer<br />

heel. While Backward Conjunction Reduction in the primed examples<br />

gives rise to a perfectly grammatical result, the NP-ellipsis cases in the doublyprimed<br />

examples are unacceptable (<strong>and</strong> certainly considerably worse than the<br />

corresponding examples with pre-determiner bare al given in Section 7.1.2.1, sub<br />

II).<br />

(236) a. Ik ken wel heel DEze stad, maar niet heel DIE stad.<br />

a′. Ik ken wel heel DEze ∅, maar niet heel DIE stad. [RNR]<br />

a′′. *Ik ken wel heel DEze stad, maar niet heel DIE ∅. [NP-ellipsis]<br />

I know AFF all this town but not all that town<br />

b. Ik ken wel heel DIT huis, maar niet heel DAT huis.<br />

b′. Ik ken wel heel DIT ∅, maar niet heel DAT huis. [RNR]<br />

b′′. *Ik ken wel heel DIT huis, maar niet heel DAT ∅. [NP-ellipsis]<br />

I know AFF all this house but not all that house<br />

The examples in (237a-c) show that bare heel can precede not only possessive<br />

pronouns, but also (semi-)genitival possessive phrases. The somewhat marked<br />

status <strong>of</strong> (237c) is probably due to the heaviness <strong>of</strong> the overall construction.<br />

(237) a. heel mijn wereld<br />

all my world<br />

b. heel mijn vaders wereld<br />

all my father’s world<br />

c. ? heel mijn vader z’n wereld<br />

all my father his world<br />

Example (238b) shows that bare heel may also precede nominalized possessive<br />

pronouns. This supports the suggestion made in Section 5.2.2.5.2 that noun phrases<br />

like de jouwe do not involve ellipsis, since otherwise we would expect examples<br />

with strings heel de jouwe to be as bad as the doubly-primed examples in (236).<br />

(238) a. Heel mijn fiets glimt, maar heel jouw fiets is roestig.<br />

all my bike shines but all your bike is rusty<br />

b. Heel mijn fiets glimt, maar heel de jouwe is roestig.<br />

all my bike shines but all yours is rusty<br />

Pre-determiner bare heel cannot be construed with noun phrases containing the<br />

indefinite article een: this is shown in (239a&b) for, respectively, [+COUNT] <strong>and</strong><br />

[-COUNT] nouns. Pre-determiner bare heel cannot combine with bare noun phrases<br />

either: (239b&c) illustrate this for, respectively, bare singulars <strong>and</strong> bare pluralia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!