15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Syntactic uses <strong>of</strong> noun phrases 1069<br />

The existential personal pronouns iem<strong>and</strong> ‘someone’ <strong>and</strong> iets ‘something’ also<br />

allow both a nonspecific <strong>and</strong> a specific interpretation. As in the quantified noun<br />

phrases discussed above, the availability <strong>of</strong> these readings depends on whether the<br />

noun phrase occurs to the right or to the left <strong>of</strong> the adverb. Note that the specific<br />

readings in the primed examples are not completely natural.<br />

(41) a. dat Jan waarschijnlijk iem<strong>and</strong> uitnodigt.<br />

that Jan probably someone prt.-invites<br />

a′. ? dat Jan iem<strong>and</strong> waarschijnlijk uitnodigt.<br />

b. dat Jan waarschijnlijk iets aan Peter wil geven.<br />

that Jan probably something to Peter wants give<br />

b′. ? dat Jan iets waarschijnlijk aan Peter wil geven.<br />

Again, the position <strong>of</strong> the nominal object affects the scope readings: whereas the<br />

frequency adverb has scope over the existential pronouns in the primeless examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> (42), the pronouns have scope over the adverb in the primed examples. As a<br />

result, (42a) contends that it has <strong>of</strong>ten been the case that Jan insulted some person or<br />

other, whereas (42a′) expresses that there is a certain person who has <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />

insulted by Jan. Similarly, (42b) contends that it has <strong>of</strong>ten been the case that Jan<br />

dropped something, whereas (42b′) expresses that there is a certain thing that has<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten been dropped by Jan. Observe that, in contrast to the primed examples in (41),<br />

the primed examples in (42) are impeccable.<br />

(42) a. dat Jan vaak iem<strong>and</strong> heeft uitgescholden.<br />

that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten someone has prt.-insulted<br />

a′. dat Jan iem<strong>and</strong> vaak heeft uitgescholden.<br />

b. dat Jan vaak iets laat vallen.<br />

that Jan <strong>of</strong>ten something drops<br />

b′. dat Jan iets vaak laat vallen.<br />

B. Universally quantified noun phrases<br />

The examples in (43) suggest that universally quantified phrases have some<br />

preference for the position following the modal adverb waarschijnlijk ‘probably’,<br />

but both orders seem to be grammatical. The difference between the two examples<br />

seems to be related to the information structure in the clause. In (43b), it is only the<br />

action <strong>of</strong> inviting that is part <strong>of</strong> the focus <strong>of</strong> the clause. Example (43a) is compatible<br />

with various information structures: the focus <strong>of</strong> the clause can be formed by the<br />

full VP alle studenten uitnodigen, the noun phrase alle studenten, or the quantifier<br />

alle — in the first two cases sentence stress falls on the noun studenten, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

third case on the quantifier alle.<br />

(43) a. Marie zal waarschijnlijk alle studenten uitnodigen.<br />

Marie will probably all students prt.-invite<br />

‘Marie will probably invite all students.’<br />

b. (?) Marie zal alle studenten waarschijnlijk uitnodigen.<br />

The two examples also seem to differ in interpretation. Example (43a) can be<br />

interpreted either as referring to a single event <strong>of</strong> inviting all the students or as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!