15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Syntactic uses <strong>of</strong> noun phrases 1079<br />

phrases, which, in turn, scramble more <strong>of</strong>ten than indefinite noun phrases. Further,<br />

we have seen that the domains in which scrambling applies differ for the different<br />

types <strong>of</strong> noun phrases. Indefinite noun phrases can cross certain VP-adverbs but not<br />

clause adverbs; definite noun phrases may cross clause adverbs when they are part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the presupposition <strong>of</strong> the clause but cannot readily cross adverbs that precede<br />

these clause adverbs; definite pronouns, finally, must precede the clause adverbs as<br />

well as the adverbs preceding them.<br />

In the literature, the fact that scrambling <strong>of</strong> nominal objects may involve<br />

different domains <strong>of</strong> application is not generally taken into account, with the result<br />

that the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a presuppositional definite noun phrase after any adverb is<br />

sometimes taken as counterevidence for the claim that such noun phrases must<br />

scramble; cf. De Hoop (2000/2003) <strong>and</strong> Van Bergen & De Swart (2010). The<br />

primeless examples in (69) suggest that this view is too simple: scrambling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

definite noun phrase can only be observed when a clause adverb like waarschijnlijk<br />

is present (or discourse particles like maar; cf. Zwart 2011). It therefore does not<br />

come as a surprise either that the primed examples in (69) allow two readings: one<br />

in which the definite noun phrase is part <strong>of</strong> the focus <strong>and</strong> one in which it is part <strong>of</strong><br />

the presupposition <strong>of</strong> the clause.<br />

(69) a. Jan zal morgen waarschijnlijk lezen.<br />

Jan will tomorrow the book probably read<br />

‘Jan will probably read the book tomorrow.’<br />

a′. Jan zal morgen het boek lezen.<br />

b. Jan zal thuis waarschijnlijk lezen.<br />

Jan will at.home the book probably read<br />

‘Jan will probably read the book at home.’<br />

b′. Jan zal thuis het boek lezen.<br />

Although we cannot exclude beforeh<strong>and</strong> the possibility that presuppositional<br />

definite noun phrases may fail to scramble under certain conditions, we believe that<br />

we can only gain a deeper insight in the factors involved when we first investigate<br />

more thoroughly the properties <strong>of</strong> the adverbs that may precede them. This is<br />

clearly a topic for future research.<br />

8.1.4. Subject noun phrases in the expletive construction<br />

°Expletive constructions are typically used to introduce a new entity into the<br />

domain <strong>of</strong> discourse. Generally speaking, these constructions are only possible<br />

when the subject is an indefinite or °weak noun phrase; this is normally referred to<br />

as the DEFINITENESS EFFECT. This is illustrated in (70): whereas the expletive<br />

construction with the indefinite noun phrase een man in (70a) is perfect, the<br />

corresponding construction with the definite noun phrase de man in (70b) is<br />

ungrammatical.<br />

(70) a. Er staat een man voor de deur.<br />

there st<strong>and</strong>s a man in.front.<strong>of</strong> the door<br />

b. *Er staat de man voor de deur.<br />

there st<strong>and</strong>s the man in.front.<strong>of</strong> the door

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!