15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

994 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

Of course, the quantifier allemaal is not able to form a constituent with a weak<br />

pronoun. We have seen in our discussion <strong>of</strong> alle in Section 7.1.2.2.2, sub IID, that<br />

this requires the pronoun to be strong.<br />

(147) a. Ze zijn gisteren uitgenodigd.<br />

they all are yesterday prt.-invited<br />

b. Hij heeft ze gisteren uitgenodigd.<br />

he has them all yesterday prt.-invited<br />

c. Hij heeft ze gisteren een uitnodiging gestuurd.<br />

he has them all yesterday an invitation sent<br />

As in the case <strong>of</strong> all other al-quantifiers, the associate <strong>of</strong> the floating quantifier<br />

allemaal can be independently quantified, although some people may object to the<br />

primed examples for pragmatic reasons.<br />

(148) a. Ik heb die dertig mensen gisteren allemaal ontmoet.<br />

I have those thirty people yesterday altogether met<br />

b. % Ik heb die vele mensen gisteren allemaal ontmoet.<br />

I have those many books yesterday altogether met<br />

(149) a. Ik heb die dertig boeken gisteren allemaal afgest<strong>of</strong>t.<br />

I have those thirty books yesterday altogether dusted<br />

b. % Ik heb die vele boeken gisteren allemaal afgest<strong>of</strong>t.<br />

I have those many books yesterday altogether dusted<br />

In this case, however, this fact cannot be used to argue against the “floating”<br />

approach, given that the examples in (150) are unacceptable for independent<br />

reasons; cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> (145). Note in passing that our judgment on (150b)<br />

diverges from the one given in Coppen (1991: 133), who assigns it a mere question<br />

mark; our informants, however, rejected the two examples in (150) categorically.<br />

(150) a. *allemaal die dertig mensen/boeken<br />

altogether those thirty people/books<br />

b. *allemaal die vele mensen/boeken<br />

altogether those many people/books<br />

As is shown in (151), the floating quantifier allemaal seems freer than the other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> al-quantifiers in being able to take the neuter pronoun het ‘it’, the singular<br />

demonstratives dit/dat ‘this/that’, <strong>and</strong> the interrogative pronoun wat ‘what’ as its<br />

associate.<br />

(151) a. Het/Dit is allemaal/*alle/*allebei/*beide verkocht.<br />

it/this has.been altogether/all/all-both/both sold<br />

‘It has all been sold.’<br />

b. Wat heb je allemaal/*alle/*allebei/*beide gelezen?<br />

what have you altogether/all/all-both/both read<br />

‘What sort <strong>of</strong> things did you read?’<br />

Note that, unlike the personal pronouns in (146), these pronouns certainly cannot be<br />

combined with the modifier allemaal: *Het allemaal is verkocht; *Wat allemaal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!