15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pre-determiners 969<br />

That (69b&b′) pattern together <strong>and</strong> are distinct from the pair in (69a) seems<br />

confirmed by (70): whereas the two examples in (70a) are fully acceptable, those in<br />

(70b) are anomalous.<br />

(70) a. Het overleg tussen de beide/twee Korea’s was vruchteloos.<br />

the consultation between the both/two Koreas was fruitless<br />

b. *Het overleg tussen allebei de/beide Korea’s was vruchteloos.<br />

the consultation between both the/both Koreas was fruitless<br />

To conclude this subsection on determiners, we want to pay some more<br />

attention to the “fusion” approach to alle, according to which it is a fused form <strong>of</strong> al<br />

<strong>and</strong> the definite determiner. The overall conclusion from the discussion above is<br />

that simplex alle combines only with plural bare noun phrases. The complementary<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> alle <strong>and</strong> the determiners makes it possible to hypothesize that the<br />

former occurs in the determiner position, which would <strong>of</strong> course support the<br />

“fusion” approach to alle. The examples in (71), however, provide evidence against<br />

this approach, since they show that alle does not behave like a definite determiner<br />

when it comes to the determination <strong>of</strong> adjectival inflection. While the definite<br />

article in (71c) triggers the inflectional -e ending in the attributive modifier <strong>of</strong> the<br />

noun, the attributive modifier in the alle phrase in (71a), taken from Perridon<br />

(1997), inflects as in the indefinite noun phrase in (71b).<br />

(71) a. alle ? slim/*slimme geknoei in de h<strong>and</strong>el<br />

all clever fiddling in the commerce<br />

b. slim/*slimme geknoei<br />

clever fiddling<br />

c. het slimme/*slim geknoei<br />

the clever fiddling<br />

Although noun phrase internal alle does not qualify as a definite determiner (which<br />

in turn may indicate that it does not occupy the determiner position in the DP), the<br />

noun phrase in (71a) has the outward appearance <strong>of</strong> a definite/strong noun phrase in<br />

the sense that it cannot be used as the associate <strong>of</strong> expletive er in existential or<br />

presentational constructions. Note that this holds for all alle phrases except for<br />

those in which alle has a high degree reading; cf. Section 7.1.1.<br />

(72) a. Er was slim geknoei in de h<strong>and</strong>el.<br />

there was clever fiddling in the commerce<br />

b. *Er was alle slim geknoei in de h<strong>and</strong>el.<br />

there was all clever fiddling in the commerce<br />

Though the adjectival inflection suggests that the noun phrase alle slim geknoei is<br />

internally indefinite, the same noun phrase behaves like a definite/strong noun<br />

phrase in its external syntactic distribution. This paradox has received little or no<br />

attention in the literature to date; we will not try to resolve the tension between<br />

these apparently irreconcilable characteristics <strong>of</strong> alle phrases here, but do repeat our<br />

earlier conclusion that alle does not behave as a contraction <strong>of</strong> al <strong>and</strong> the definite<br />

article.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!