15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1100 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

noun phrase, not with the singular pronoun; the examples in (127) show that plural<br />

agreement is normally not possible when the pronoun het/dat/dit functions as<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> an adjectival or prepositional copular construction.<br />

(127) a. Het/Dit/Dat is/*zijn kapot.<br />

it/this/that is/are broken<br />

b. Het/Dit/Dat is/*zijn in de tuin.<br />

it/this/that is/are in the garden<br />

Another reason to assume that the pronouns function as predicates is that when the<br />

nominal predicate is replaced by a pronoun, the latter will appear in its nominal<br />

form; this cannot, <strong>of</strong> course, be shown for the second person, plural pronoun given<br />

that the subject <strong>and</strong> object form are identical.<br />

(128) a. Dat ben ik/*mij. a′. Dat zijn wij/*ons.<br />

that am I/me that are we/us<br />

b. Dat ben jij/*jou. b′. Dat zijn jullie.<br />

that are you/you that are you<br />

c. Dat is zij/*haar. c′. Dat zijn zij/*hen.<br />

that is she/her that are they/them<br />

The claim that the pronouns in (126) function as predicates <strong>of</strong> the copular<br />

constructions was challenged by Merckens (1961), who argued that these examples<br />

are actually ambiguous. This is illustrated by the examples in (129), the meanings<br />

<strong>of</strong> which will become clear from the English translations. The function <strong>of</strong> the leftdislocated<br />

constituents in these <strong>and</strong> the following examples is to force the intended<br />

subject/predicate reading on the pronoun dat.<br />

(129) a. Jan en Piet, dat zijn aardige jongens. [dat = subject]<br />

Jan <strong>and</strong> Piet that are nice boys<br />

‘Jan <strong>and</strong> Piet are nice boys.’<br />

b. Behulpzaam, dat zijn aardige jongens. [dat = predicate]<br />

helpful that are nice boys<br />

‘Nice boys are helpful.’<br />

The same ambiguity is apparent from embedded clauses like those in (130). given<br />

that subject pronouns are normally right-adjacent to the complementizer <strong>and</strong><br />

predicates left-adjacent to the verbs in clause-final position; cf. Ik vind dat dat mooi<br />

is ‘I think that that is beautiful’ versus *Ik vind dat mooi dat is. This means that dat<br />

functions as a subject in (130a) <strong>and</strong> as a predicate in (130b). The primed examples<br />

show that this conclusion is supported by the interpretation <strong>of</strong> these examples.<br />

(130) a. Jan en Piet, ik denk dat dat aardige jongens zijn. [dat = subject]<br />

Jan <strong>and</strong> Piet I think that that nice boys are<br />

a′. *Behulpzaam, ik denk dat dat aardige jongens zijn.<br />

helpful I think that that nice boys are<br />

b. Behulpzaam, ik denk dat aardige jongens dat zijn. [dat = predicate]<br />

helpful I think that nice boys that are<br />

b. *Jan en Piet, ik denk dat aardige jongens dat zijn.<br />

Jan <strong>and</strong> Piet I think that nice boys that are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!