15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Determiners: articles <strong>and</strong> pronouns 793<br />

unacceptable, unless some presuppositional constituent is present; cf. (324a) <strong>and</strong><br />

(329a).<br />

(332) a. Wie is/zijn *(er) vertrokken?<br />

b. Wat ligt *(er) in de la?<br />

The examples in (333) show that the pronouns wie <strong>and</strong> wat can be modified by<br />

elements like dan ook or om het even. However, this results in the loss <strong>of</strong> their<br />

interrogative force: the meaning <strong>of</strong> these phrases comes close to English formations<br />

with any. Perhaps this is not so surprising for wat, given that we will see in the next<br />

section that this pronoun can also be used as a quantificational personal pronoun,<br />

but it is for wie, which lacks this option.<br />

(333) a. Dit kan door wie dan ook/om het even wie gedaan zijn.<br />

this can by anyone/anyone done be<br />

‘This could be done by anyone.’<br />

b. Je kan hem om het even wat geven.<br />

you can him anything give<br />

Interrogative personal pronouns do not readily allow other forms <strong>of</strong> modification.<br />

The examples in (334) involving postmodification, for example, are marginal at<br />

best.<br />

(334) a. ?? Wie bij de deur is jouw vader?<br />

who near the door is your father<br />

a′. ?? Wie daar is je vader?<br />

who there is your father<br />

b. ?? Wie die hier gisteren was is v<strong>and</strong>aag naar Rome vertrokken?<br />

who that here yesterday was is today to Rome left<br />

‘Who that was here yesterday has left for Rome today?’<br />

5.2.1.3. Quantificational personal pronouns<br />

The quantificational personal pronouns can also be divided into [+HUMAN] <strong>and</strong><br />

[-HUMAN] forms. The former consist <strong>of</strong> the existential quantifier iem<strong>and</strong> ‘someone’<br />

<strong>and</strong> the universally quantified pronoun iedereen (in writing, the formal forms<br />

(een)ieder <strong>and</strong> elkeen can also be found, the latter <strong>of</strong> which is generally considered<br />

archaic). The [-HUMAN] counterparts <strong>of</strong> these pronouns are iets ‘something’, or its<br />

more colloquial alternate wat, <strong>and</strong> alles ‘all’. Both the [+HUMAN] <strong>and</strong> [-HUMAN]<br />

existential quantifiers have negative counterparts, which are, respectively, niem<strong>and</strong><br />

‘nobody’ <strong>and</strong> niets or its more colloquial alternate, niks ‘nothing’.<br />

Table 7: Quantificational personal pronouns<br />

[+HUMAN] [-HUMAN]<br />

EXISTENTIAL POSITIVE iem<strong>and</strong> ‘someone’ iets/wat ‘something’<br />

NEGATIVE niem<strong>and</strong> ‘nobody’ niets/niks ‘something’<br />

UNIVERSAL iedereen ‘everybody’ alles ‘everything’<br />

Below, we will discuss some properties <strong>of</strong> the quantificational nouns shown in<br />

Table 7. Before we do this we want to note that in traditional grammar, forms like

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!