15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

754 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

This is illustrated by the unacceptability <strong>of</strong> scrambled counterparts <strong>of</strong> the primeless<br />

examples in (216), given in (217).<br />

(217) a. *? Er is geen brief v<strong>and</strong>aag verstuurd.<br />

b. *Er spelen geen kinderen v<strong>and</strong>aag op straat.<br />

c. *Er stond geen melk gisteren in de ijskast.<br />

It seems that noun phrases with geen behave like indefinites even in generic<br />

contexts. In order to see this, consider the generic constructions in (218). Example<br />

(218a) shows that the generic plural noun phrase must be scrambled to a position in<br />

front <strong>of</strong> the °clause adverb waarschijnlijk ‘probably’; cf. Section 8.1.3.1, sub III.<br />

The noun phrase with geen in (218b), by contrast, cannot be placed to the left <strong>of</strong><br />

waarschijnlijk.<br />

(218) a. Hij begrijpt < formules> waarschijnlijk niet.<br />

he underst<strong>and</strong>s formulae probably not<br />

‘He probably doesn’t underst<strong>and</strong> formulae.’<br />

b. Hij begrijpt waarschijnlijk .<br />

he underst<strong>and</strong>s no formulae probably<br />

‘He probably doesn’t underst<strong>and</strong> formulae.’<br />

To conclude this section, note that negative sentences with generic bare noun<br />

phrases sometimes feature intriguing semantic differences between the variants<br />

involving niet <strong>and</strong> their counterparts with geen. Example (219a), for example,<br />

allows two subtly different lexical meanings <strong>of</strong> accepteren ‘to accept’; the speaker<br />

either does not wish to receive any charity, or he is opposed to the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

charity as a phenomenon. This latter reading is conspicuously more prominent in<br />

(219b).<br />

(219) a. Ik accepteer geen liefdadigheid.<br />

I accept no charity<br />

b. Ik accepteer liefdadigheid niet.<br />

I accept charity not<br />

5.1.5.1.3. Special semantics<br />

The previous sections have discussed the core semantics <strong>of</strong> the negative article<br />

geen. This section addresses a number <strong>of</strong> more or less specialized meaning<br />

contributions <strong>of</strong> geen. We will start our discussion with the “not a single” reading,<br />

which stays close to the core semantics <strong>of</strong> negative quantification, but we will see<br />

that there are contexts in which the semantic contribution made by geen can diverge<br />

substantially from the core meaning; negative quantification is sometimes even<br />

entirely absent in some <strong>of</strong> geen’s uses.<br />

I. “Not a single” reading<br />

The negative article geen sometimes expresses a meaning that is stronger than<br />

simple negation <strong>and</strong> which we will refer to as the “not a single” reading. This<br />

reading requires that geen be followed by some stressed element, <strong>and</strong> can<br />

sometimes be enhanced by the addition <strong>of</strong> certain elements.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!