15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1096 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

most conspicuous feature is the “mock archaic” use <strong>of</strong> genitive case: the genitive<br />

determiner des, which was originally the masculine or neuter article, is now also<br />

used with feminine/plural noun phrases, as in (115b&c), <strong>and</strong> with proper nouns like<br />

Ajax, as in (115d). For more discussion <strong>and</strong> representative examples, see<br />

www.onzetaal.nl/taaladvies/advies/des-vrouws <strong>and</strong>, especially, Hoeksema (1998) .<br />

(115) a. Dat is des kinds.<br />

that is the childgen<br />

‘That’s how children are.’<br />

b. Ontrouw is des vrouw/des mensen(s).<br />

infidelity is themasc,gen womangen/person<br />

‘Infidelity is a typical female trait.’<br />

c. IJdelheid is des vrouws/des mensen(s).<br />

vanity is themasc,gen womangen/person<br />

‘Vanity is a typical human trait.’<br />

d. Verdedigen is niet des Ajax.<br />

to defend is not themasc,gen Ajax<br />

‘A defensive attitude is not typical for Ajax.’<br />

IV. Differences between the three types <strong>of</strong> nominal predicates<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> ways in which the three types <strong>of</strong> nominal predicates<br />

discussed in the previous subsections exhibit different syntactic behaviors, which<br />

are related to their semantic properties. Here we will discuss some without claiming<br />

that we are discussing the differences exhaustively.<br />

A. Modification <strong>of</strong> the predicate by means <strong>of</strong> the PP van beroep ‘by pr<strong>of</strong>ession’<br />

To bare dokter in (104a) can readily be added van beroep ‘by pr<strong>of</strong>ession’, as seen in<br />

(116a), whereas it is impossible to add van beroep to the nominal predicates in<br />

(104b&c). This suggests that only (104a) inherently expresses an occupation.<br />

(116) a. Jan is dokter van beroep.<br />

Jan is physician by pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

b. *Jan is de dokter van beroep.<br />

Jan is the physician by pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

c. *Jan is een dokter van beroep.<br />

Jan is a physician by pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

B. The nominal predicate as SUBJECT <strong>of</strong> a nominal predicate headed by beroep<br />

The (a)-examples in (117) show that a bare nominal predicate can also be used as<br />

the logical SUBJECT <strong>of</strong> a °second order predicate headed by beroep ‘pr<strong>of</strong>ession’. It is<br />

impossible, however, to use nominal predicates preceded by a definite or indefinite<br />

article as the SUBJECT <strong>of</strong> such a predicate; cf. examples (117b&c). Again, this<br />

suggests that only bare nouns inherently express an occupation.<br />

(117) a. Dokter is een mooi beroep.<br />

physician is a nice pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

a′. Ik vind dokter een mooi beroep.<br />

I consider physician a nice pr<strong>of</strong>ession

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!