15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2. Quantifiers<br />

Numerals <strong>and</strong> quantifiers 895<br />

This section discusses quantifiers like alle/sommige/vele ‘all/some/many’. We will<br />

begin in Section 6.2.1 with a discussion <strong>of</strong> some more general properties <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

notions related to these quantifiers. After that, Sections 6.2.2 to 6.2.4 will discuss<br />

the universal, existential <strong>and</strong> degree quantifiers in more detail.<br />

6.2.1. Introduction<br />

This section will discuss some more general semantic <strong>and</strong> syntactic properties <strong>of</strong><br />

(noun phrases containing) quantifiers. We will start with a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

core meaning <strong>of</strong> the quantifiers. This will be followed by a discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distinction between what has become known in the literature as weak <strong>and</strong> strong<br />

quantifiers. After that we will briefly discuss the fact that quantifiers display<br />

different behavior with respect to the question <strong>of</strong> what kinds <strong>of</strong> inference are<br />

licensed by using certain quantifiers. We conclude with a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

independent use <strong>of</strong> quantifiers, that is, their use as an argument or a floating<br />

quantifier.<br />

I. Core semantics<br />

The easiest way to explain the core meaning <strong>of</strong> the quantifiers is by using Figure 1<br />

from Section 1.1.2.2.1, repeated below, to represent the subject-predicate relation in<br />

a clause. In this figure, A represents the set denoted by the subject NP <strong>and</strong> B the set<br />

denoted by the verb phrase. The intersection A ∩ B denotes the set <strong>of</strong> entities for<br />

which the proposition expressed by the clause is claimed to be true. In an example<br />

like Jan w<strong>and</strong>elt op straat, for example, it is claimed that the set denoted by A, viz.<br />

{Jan}, is properly included in set B, which is constituted by the people walking in<br />

the street. In other words, it expresses that A - (A ∩ B) = ∅.<br />

A B<br />

A ∩ B<br />

Figure 1: Set-theoretic representation <strong>of</strong> the subject-predicate relation<br />

The quantifiers have a function similar to that <strong>of</strong> the cardinal numerals, namely, to<br />

indicate the size or the cardinality <strong>of</strong> intersection A ∩ B. They differ from the<br />

cardinal numerals, however, in that they do not do this in a very precise manner. An<br />

existential quantifier like sommige or enkele ‘some’ in (78a), for example, simply<br />

indicates that A ∩ B has a cardinality larger than 1. The degree quantifier veel<br />

‘many’ in (78b) indicates that the cardinality <strong>of</strong> A ∩ B is larger than a certain<br />

contextually defined norm n. And the universal quantifier alle ‘all’ in (78c)<br />

expresses that the intersection <strong>of</strong> A <strong>and</strong> B exhausts set A, that is, that<br />

A - (A ∩ B) = ∅.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!