15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

762 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

combined with pronouns <strong>and</strong> proper nouns. Subsection III discusses the cooccurrence<br />

restrictions with other elements within the noun phrase.<br />

I. Geen <strong>and</strong> noun phrase types<br />

Geen is remarkably flexible when it comes to the types <strong>of</strong> noun phrase that it can<br />

combine with. It is possible for geen to combine with count nouns <strong>of</strong> all genders<br />

<strong>and</strong> numbers. Geen can also be construed with non-count nouns. Examples are<br />

given in Table 3.<br />

Table 3: Distribution <strong>of</strong> geen in noun phrases headed by count/non-count nouns<br />

COUNT<br />

NOUNS<br />

NON-COUNT<br />

NOUNS<br />

SINGULAR<br />

[-NEUTER] [+NEUTER]<br />

geen stad<br />

no town<br />

geen ellende/wijn<br />

no misery /wine<br />

geen huis<br />

no house<br />

geen verdriet/water<br />

no sorrow/water<br />

PLURAL<br />

geen steden/huizen<br />

no towns/houses<br />

n.a.<br />

Though geen can in principle combine with plural count noun phrases, there are<br />

restrictions on the use <strong>of</strong> plurals in combination with geen: whereas the plural noun<br />

schepen ‘ships’ can be used with geen in the primeless sentences <strong>of</strong> (244), this is<br />

impossible in the primed examples that feature the more special “not a single”<br />

reading <strong>of</strong> geen — this reading requires that the noun is singular, as in (220) above.<br />

(244) a. Er varen geen schepen op de zee.<br />

there sail no ships on the sea<br />

‘There are no ships sailing on the sea.’<br />

a′. *Geen schepen zijn 100% waterdicht.<br />

no ships are 100 per cent watertight<br />

b. Ik heb daar geen schepen gezien.<br />

I have there no ships seen<br />

‘I didn’t see any ships there.’<br />

b′. *Geen schepen levert men 100% waterdicht af.<br />

no ships delivers one 100 per cent watertight prt.<br />

The ungrammaticality <strong>of</strong> the primed examples in (244) matches that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corresponding cases featuring geen enkel(e)/één in (245b); that these examples are<br />

unacceptable is not surprising from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> their meaning “not a<br />

single”. What is interesting, though, is that enkel(e) is compatible with plural noun<br />

phrases in other contexts: enkele schepen is perfect as the plural counterpart <strong>of</strong> een<br />

enkel schip ‘a single ship’. This means that it is not entirely clear what causes the<br />

unacceptability <strong>of</strong> (245b) with enkel(e).<br />

(245) a. Geen enkel/één schip is 100% waterdicht.<br />

no single/one ship is 100 per cent watertight<br />

b. *Geen enkele/één schepen zijn 100% waterdicht.<br />

no single/one ships are 100 per cent watertight

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!