15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

686 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

(20) Ik heb een boek uit je kast gehaald.<br />

I have a book out <strong>of</strong> your bookcase taken<br />

‘I have taken a book from your shelves.’<br />

The discussion above amounts to saying that, unlike the case with definite noun<br />

phrases, the use <strong>of</strong> an indefinite noun phrase in presentative clauses does not imply<br />

that set A in Figure 1 only contains entities that are part <strong>of</strong> domain D. It rather<br />

contains all entities that satisfy the description <strong>of</strong> the NP, <strong>and</strong> the referent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

noun phrase therefore need not be identifiable for the speaker <strong>and</strong> the hearer. In this<br />

sense indefinite noun phrases are typically non-D-linked. The same thing holds for<br />

indefinite noun phrases headed by a non-count noun like in Er staat wijn in de<br />

keuken ‘There is wine in the kitchen’; cf. the discussion below (7).<br />

III. Special cases<br />

Subsections I <strong>and</strong> II have shown that the use <strong>of</strong> a definite noun phrase indicates that<br />

the referent in question is part <strong>of</strong> domain D, whereas indefinite noun phrases may<br />

introduce new referents into domain D. There are, however, certain special<br />

restrictions on the use <strong>of</strong> indefinite noun phrases, which is due to the fact that<br />

entities can sometimes also be introduced into domain D by using a definite noun<br />

phrase. Without claiming to be exhaustive, we will briefly discuss below some<br />

typical situations in which this is possible.<br />

A. Common knowledge<br />

Picture the following situation. John is walking, <strong>and</strong> he meets someone he has never<br />

seen before. Given that domain D is largely determined by agreement among the<br />

participants in the discourse, one would assume that the conversation between John<br />

<strong>and</strong> the other person starts with a tabula rasa. However, the fact that John could not<br />

utter example (21a) without sounding silly shows that certain entities cannot be<br />

introduced into discourse by means <strong>of</strong> an indefinite noun phrase: (21a) suggests that<br />

there is more than one sun that could be relevant in this context, <strong>and</strong> this conflicts<br />

with the knowledge that we normally ascribe to people. Therefore the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

definite noun phrase is preferred. This shows that the use <strong>of</strong> definite noun phrases<br />

does not entirely depend on domain D, but may also reflect intuitions <strong>of</strong> the speaker<br />

about the extra-linguistic knowledge one can ascribe to all individuals (in his<br />

society). Or, to say it differently, some entities like the sun, moon, etc. can be<br />

evoked in any conversation without being explicitly part <strong>of</strong> domain D; simply<br />

mentioning the sun is sufficient for any speaker to identify the entity the noun<br />

phrase is referring to.<br />

(21) a. Er komt een zon op.<br />

there rises a sun prt.<br />

‘A sun is rising.’<br />

b. De zon komt op.<br />

the sun rises prt.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!